Errors in Results and Table 1
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
In the Original Investigation titled “Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Routine Depression Screening for Adolescents in Primary Care,”^1^ published online on May 2, 2025, the phrase “was associated with” was erroneously included in a sentence in the Results section that should instead read “Reducing the time horizon from 10 years to 3 years increased ICERs.” Additionally, in Table 1, the superscript s beside the fifth to last row (“Relative risk of suicidality”) should be a superscript t, the superscript q beside the second to last row (“Relative risk of suicidality”) should be a superscript r, and the superscript t in the last row (“Probability of discontinuing treatment”) should be a superscript s. This article was corrected online.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.