Anxiety, depression, and quality of life of caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer

TL;DR

This study explores how anxiety and depression affect the quality of life of caregivers for cancer patients receiving palliative care.

Contribution

The study identifies significant correlations between psychological symptoms and quality of life in caregivers of palliative care cancer patients.

Findings

Anxiety and depression are strongly correlated with lower quality of life in caregivers.

Caregivers with depression report symptoms like sadness, irritability, and fatigue.

Psychological support strategies are needed to improve caregiver well-being.

Abstract

Palliative care has recently gained importance in the context of life-threatening diseases, such as cancer, that affect the mental health of patients and their caregivers. Psychological symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, are the most prevalent in this population.

To determine the association between anxiety, depression, and quality of life of caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer.

A quantitative, descriptive, and correlational design was used. A total of 190 primary caregivers recruited from Colombian hospitals and home care programs participated. The Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness-Family Carer (QOLLTI-FT) questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used. The analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics 26.0, using descriptive and inferential statistics.

The predominant sex was female, and the level of education was high school. The mean age of the caregivers was 44.15 years, and the mean age of the patients was 64.51 years. The average time as a caregiver was 33.79 ± 64.77 months. The results show correlations between anxiety and caregiver status (p≤0.000), anxiety and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use (p≤0.006). There were also correlations between anxiety, quality of life, and caregiver status (p≤0.000) and between depression and total quality of life (p≤0.001).

Correlations were also found between depression and quality of life and between hours of daily care and the level of dependency of the cancer patient. This entails the need to manage the psychological symptoms as soon as the family member is diagnosed to prevent alterations in their quality of life that could affect their well-being.

Caregivers with moderate or severe depression were more likely to report symptoms of sadness, punishment feelings, self-dislike, suicidal thoughts or wishes, indecisiveness, irritability, changes in appetite, concentration difficulty, and tiredness or fatigue. Among caregivers with mild depression, loss of interest in sex, agitation, and past failure were identified. Strategies for psycho-emotional counseling, education, and support for caregivers are needed.

Full text

Introduction

According to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), cancer is the second leading cause of death in the Region of the Americas, with an estimated 4 million new cases and 1.4 million deaths in 20201,2. The global burden is projected to increase to 30 million new cancer cases by 2040, with the greatest increase in low- and middle-income countries1,2. In Latin American countries such as Colombia, 113,221 new cases and 54,987 deaths were reported in 20203.

This situation has raised global alarm, especially in developing countries with barriers to progress and cost overruns for health systems. Sometimes, this situation is due to a lack of preparedness of systems to meet the needs of people with cancer and their caregivers, leading to late interventions that can complicate disease management4.

Advances in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care have improved patient survival and shifted care from highly complex institutions to outpatient centers or patients’ homes. These changes have resulted in family caregivers assuming caregiving activities for the person with cancer5, experiencing changes in their daily roles, and feeling overburdened, which negatively affects their health and quality of life6. Several studies indicate the prevalence of mental disorders in cancer patients’ caregivers that interfere with their self-care7,8. Common feelings among caregivers include anxiety, distress, and depression9,10, as well as changes in roles at home, school, or work11. In referring to anxiety and depression, Watson and Clark12 reported a temperamental sensitivity to negative stimuli such as fear, anxiety, sadness, guilt, hostility, dissatisfaction, hopelessness, somatic complaints, and a negative self-image.

Depression is often accompanied by changes in sleep, appetite, and psychomotor function, along with reduced attention, concentration, and decision-making ability. It may also involve a loss of self-confidence, feelings of inferiority, worthlessness or guilt, a sense of hopelessness, and recurrent thoughts of death, including suicidal ideation, planning, or attempts13.

On the other hand, anxiety, as defined by Beck14, is an emotional and physiological response to a perceived threat or danger. It can manifest through symptoms such as tremors, fear, and palpitations, among others. Beck emphasizes that anxiety is not solely an emotional phenomenon but also has cognitive and somatic dimensions14.

Regarding caregivers' quality of life, Cohen15 defines it as subjective well-being that reflects the gaps between an individual's hopes and expectations and their current experiences. This concept encompasses aspects such as caregiver status, patient well-being, quality of care, perspectives, environment, finances, and relationships.

In most cases, cancer care focuses primarily on the patient’s needs and the instructions healthcare professionals provide to caregivers for home care. However, little to no specific attention is given to the caregivers despite the emotional and physical burden they bear. This study goes beyond the limited existing scientific evidence by focusing on the well-being of caregivers, who are fundamental in the cancer care process. By analyzing anxiety, depression, and quality of life among caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer, the study aims to advance knowledge in this area and identify specific needs that could inform future, more effective support interventions. The present study aims to determine the association between anxiety, depression, and quality of life of caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer.

Materials and Methods

**Study Design and Participants **

A descriptive correlational study was conducted between January and August 2023, involving 190 family caregivers of cancer patients who had no curative treatment options and received care from either inpatient or community-based palliative care teams. Family caregivers over 18 years old from four regions of the country, who were the primary caregivers responsible for patient care, were invited to participate in this study. Caregivers were excluded from the study if they had cognitive impairment, had participated in a previous study, had previously cared for another person with cancer, or were hired to provide care. The participants were selected using convenience sampling.

** Measurements**

The Sociodemographic Characterization Form was used to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and variables related to the caregiver’s profile.

The Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Carer Version (QOLLTI-F) was used to assess the quality of life of the palliative care caregivers. The Latin American-Spanish version of the QOLLTI-F has 16 items and seven dimensions. The scale has response options on a scale of 0 to 10, where the higher the score, the higher the quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 160 points. The scale has an internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82 for the Latin American-Spanish version15.

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) was used to identify the presence of depression in the family caregivers. The BDI-II consists of 21 items that are self-rated by the participants by marking the statement that best fits their current situation. Total scores on the scale range from 0 to 63, with participants falling into one of four groups: 0-13, minimal depression; 14-19, mild depression; 20-28, moderate depression; and 29-63, severe depression. This inventory had excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91 in the Colombian population13.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to assess somatic symptoms of anxiety in the family caregivers. This questionnaire consists of 21 questions on a response scale of 0 to 3, with a score range of 0 to 63 points. The cut-off points report minimal anxiety from 0 to 5 points, mild anxiety from 6 to 15 points, moderate anxiety from 16 to 30 points, and severe anxiety from 31 to 63 points. This scale has been validated in Spanish and shows a unidimensional structure and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.9413.

Data collection

Participants were recruited from third- and fourth-level hospitals and home care programs in four Colombian cities: Bogotá, Medellín, Valledupar, and Cali. Caregivers were invited to participate in the study in hospital rooms or via telephone contact for those at home. Research assistants were trained to administer the instruments, present the study objectives, review the inclusion criteria, and invite caregivers to participate. Those who agreed to participate signed the informed consent form. The research instruments were interviewer-administered in hospital rooms or during home visits.

Data Analysis

Data were tabulated in a Microsoft Excel database and then analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sociodemographic characteristics; frequencies, means, and standard deviations were calculated. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson’s chi-square tests were employed to determine the relationship between participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and their relationship with anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The information is stored in the Mendeley dataset16.

Ethical Considerations

The Research Ethics Committee of Universidad Antonio Nariño approved the research in the ordinary session of August 16, 2022, with code 2022211. According to Resolution 008430 of 1993 from the Colombian Ministry of Health, the research posed minimal risk to participants17. Bioethical principles were upheld, informed consent was obtained, participants' autonomy was respected, and they were free to withdraw voluntarily.

Results

**Caregivers’ Sociodemographic characteristics **

A total of 190 caregivers participated in the study, and their sociodemographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients. Colombia 2023. n=190Characteristic n(%) Caregiver conditions and sociodemographic profileDo you have any medical diagnoses? No 143 (75.30) Yes 47 (24.70) Sex Female147 (77.40) Male 43 (22.60) Age < 30 years 47 (24.70) 31 - 43 years 50 (26.30) 44 - 56 years 47 (24.70) > 57 years 46 (24.20) Level of education Elementary school 38 (20.00) Bachelor’s degree 41 (21.60) High school 65 (34.20) Technician 46 (24.20) Marital status Married 54 (28.40) Single/Divorced 86 (45.30) Cohabitation 50 (26.30) Religion Have a religious practice 174 (91.60) No religious practice 16 (8.40) Occupation Employee 77 (40.50) Homemaker 72 (37.90) Self-employed 34 (17.90) Retired 7 (3.70) Socioeconomic stratification Lower-low 34 (17.90) Low 80 (42.10) Lower-middle 54 (28.40) Middle 20 (10.50) Upper-middle 2 (1.10) Do you care for the person after having been diagnosed? No 33 (17.40) Yes 157 (82.60) Burden and support perception Sole caregiver No113 (59.50) Yes 77 (40.50) Time as a caregiver (months) < 5 50 (26.30) 6-12 49 (25.80)13-36 47 (24.70) > 37 44 (23.20) Number of hours of daily caregiving Up to 8 hours49 (25.80) 8-12 hours 47 (24.70) > 12 hours 94 (49.50) Do you have previous experience as a caregiver? No 115 (60.50)Yes 75 (39.50) PULSES Profile Fully independent120 (63.20) Requires assistance 33 (17.40) Fully dependent 37 (19.50) The person you are caring for is a Friend14 (7.40) Spouse45 (23.70) Child 10 (5.30)Parent, sibling 99 (52.10) Other (grandparent, grandchild, cousin) 22 (11.60) Media and Information Use of ICT for care? No38 (20.00) Yes 152 (80.00)ICT Proficiency High 42 (22.10) Low 38 (20.00) Middle 105 (55.30) None 5 (2.60) ICT used for care Computer, internet71 (37.40) Phone, internet 60 (31.60) Television 59 (31.10) ICT-Information and Communication Technology

Anxiety and depressive symptoms and their association with quality of life in family caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer

Regarding anxiety symptoms, 22 caregivers were found to have moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (14 and 8, respectively). Feeling hot, fear of the worst happening, being terrified or afraid, nervousness, fear of losing control, and faint or lightheadedness were common symptoms among caregivers with moderate anxiety. Caregivers with severe anxiety reported physical symptoms such as feeling hot, wobbliness in legs, heart pounding/racing, dizziness, feeling of choking, indigestion, and hot/cold sweats. In addition, symptoms include fear of the worst happening, unsteadiness, being terrified or afraid, nervousness, shaky/unsteady, fear of losing control, and inability to relax.

Regarding symptoms of depression, 34 caregivers were found to have mild depression, 19 had moderate depression, and 25 had severe depression. Pessimism, loss of pleasure, guilty feelings, self-criticalness, crying, loss of interest, worthlessness, loss of energy, and changes in sleeping patterns were symptoms present in all three classification groups of depression. In addition, caregivers with moderate or severe depression were more likely to report symptoms of sadness, punishment feelings, self-dislike, suicidal thoughts or wishes, indecisiveness, irritability, changes in appetite, concentration difficulty, and tiredness or fatigue. Among caregivers with mild depression, loss of interest in sex, agitation, and past failure were identified as common symptoms.

In terms of quality of life, the mean scores showed acceptable results for overall QOL. Below-average scores were found for the patient condition dimension and borderline scores for the caregiver’s state dimension. The internal consistency for the total scale domains was 0.75 (Table 2).

Table 2. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients Colombia 2023. n=190Quality of Life Mean SD 95% CI Cronbach’s Alpha Environment15.30 3.78 14.59 – 15.67 0.75 Patient condition3.86 2.87 3.45 – 4.27Caregiver own state 36.95 10.47 35.45 – 38.45 Caregiver outlook24.57 5.25 23.82 – 25.33 Quality of care 16.91 3.20 16.45 – 17.36Relationships 16.99 3.11 16.55 – 17.44QOLLTI-F Total 114.42 20.88 111.43 – 117.41

In terms of the sociodemographic characteristics of caregivers, statistically significant differences were found between anxiety and level of ICT proficiency, with non-use of ICT being a risk factor. As for depression, the number of hours of daily care, the patient’s level of dependency, and the average level of ICT use were identified as risk factors, with these variables showing statistically significant differences. The level of education and not being a sole caregiver were identified as protective factors with statistically significant differences for depression (Table 3).

Table 3 Sociodemographic characteristics, anxiety, and depression in caregivers of palliative care patients. Colombia 2023. n=190* Suggests anxiety n=22 Without anxiety n=168 Prevalence ratio (95% CI) P Suggests depression n=78 Without depression n=112 Prevalence ratio (95% CI) P Caregiver conditions and sociodemographic profile Sex

0.10

0.01 Female 20 (13.60) 127 (86.40)2.92 (0.71 - 12.02) 67 (45.60) 80 (54.40) 1.78 (0.03 - 3.05) Male 2 (4.70) 41 (95.30) 1 11 (25.60) 32 (74.40) 1 Age

< 30 years 7 (14.00) 43 (86.00) 1.09 (0.39 - 3.02) 0.85 17 (34.00) 33 (66.00) 0.72 (0.44 - 1.11) 0.19 31 - 43 years 6 (12.80) 41 (87.20)1 (0.34 - 2.87) >0.99 23 (48.90) 24 (51.10) 1.04 (0.68 - 1.59) 0.83 44 - 56 years 3 (6.50) 43 (93.50) 0.51 (0.13 - 1.92) 0.31 16 (34.80) 30 (65.20) 0.74 (0.45 - 1.22) 0.23 > 57 years 6 (12.80) 41 (87.20) 1 22 (46.80) 25 (53.20) 1 Level of education

Elementary school 5 (13.20) 33 (86.80)1.34 (0.39 - 6.45) 0.63 9 (23.70)29 (76.30) 0.44 (0.23 - 0.83)0.006 High school 5 (7.70)60 (92.30) 0.78 (0.22 - 2.76) 0.71 27 (41.50) 38 (58.50) 0.77 (0.51 - 1.16) 0.22 Technician 8 (17.40) 38 (82.60)1.78 (0.57 - 5.48) 0.30 20 (43.50)26 (56.50) 0.81 (0.52 - 1.25) 0.34 Bachelor’s degree 4 (9.80)37 (90.20) 1 22 (53.70) 19 (46.30) 1 Socioeconomic stratification

Lower-low 5 (14.70) 29 (85.30) 2.94 (0.36 - 23.42) 0.27 6 (17.60) 28 (82.40) 0.35 (0.07- 1.68) 0.26 Low 10 (12.50) 70 (87.50) 2.5 (0.339 - 18.4) 0.37 34 (42.50) 46 (57.50) 0.85 (0.20 - 3.47) 0.83 Lower-middle 4 (7.40) 50 (92.60) 1.48 (0.176 - 12.47) 0.71 25 (46.30) 29 (53.70) 0.70 (0.45 - 1.09) 0.16Middle 1 (5.00) 19 (95.00) 1 12 (60.00) 8 (840.00) 0.77 (0.48 - 1.22) 0.29 Upper-middle 2 (100) 0 (0.00)---- 1 (50.00) 1 (50.00) 1 The caregiver cares for the person after having been diagnosed

0.91

0.78 No 4 (12.10) 29 (87.90) 1.05 (0.38 - 2.92) 7 (21.20) 26 (78.80) 1.20 (0.28 - 5.02) Yes 18 (11.50) 139 (88.50) 1 71 (45.20) 86 (54.80) 1 Burden and support perception Sole caregiver

0.07

0.010 No17 (15.00) 96 (85.00) 2.31 (0.89 - 6.01) 56 (49.60) 57 (50.40) 0.46 (0.23 - 0.92) Yes 5 (6.50) 72 (93.50) 1 22 (28.60) 55 (71.40) 1 Number of hours of daily caregiving

Up to 8 hours 4 (8.20) 45 (91.80) 0.69 (0.23 - 2.07) 0.51 26 (53.10) 23 (46.90) 1.73 (1.16 - 2.58) <0.005 8-12 hours 7 (14.90) 40 (85.10) 1.27 (0.52 - 3.07) 0.59 23 (48.90) 34 (51.10) 1.72 (1.15 - 2.56)<0.005 >12 hours 11 (11.70) 83 (88.30) 1 29 (30.90) 65 (69.10)1 ICT Proficiency

None 3 (60.00) 2 (40.00) 5.04 (1.69 - 15.00) 0.006 2 (40.00) 3 (60.00) 1.40 (0.43 - 4.53) 0.59 Low 2 (5.30) 36 (94.70) 0.44 (0.09 - 2.14) 0.29 13 (34.20) 25 (65.80) 1.19 (0.62 - 2.29) 0.58 Middle 12 (11.40) 93 (88.60) 0.96 (0.36 - 2.55) 0.93 51 (48.60) 54 (51.40) 1.70 (1.01 - 2.85) 0.02 High 5 (11.90) 37 (88.10) 1 12 (28.60) 30 (71.40) 1 PULSES Profile

Requires human assistance 2 (6.10) 31 (93.90) 0.45 (0.11 - 1.87) 0.25 6 (18.20) 27 (81.80) 0.57 (0.26 -1.24) 0.12 Fully dependent 4 (10.80) 33 (89.20) 0.81 (0.28 - 2.27) 0.68 34 (91.90) 3 (8.10) 2.90 (2.19 - 3.83) <0.001Fully independent 16 (13.30) 104 (86.70)1 38 (31.70) 82 (68.30) 1

• Pearson’s chi-square test

The analysis against manifestations of anxiety and quality of life yielded statistically significant differences among caregivers in the dimension "caregiver status," with no other important results. On the contrary, statistically significant differences were found between the levels of depression and most of the caregivers' quality of life dimensions except for the patient's condition. Higher scores for the manifestation of moderate or severe depression were identified for the dimensions of environment, quality of care, and relationship (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. Quality of life and anxiety in caregivers of palliative care patients. Colombia 2023. n=190 Very low anxiety n=168 Moderate anxiety n=14 Severe anxiety n=8 p-value Median Min-max Median Min-max Median Min-max Environment 15.00 1-20 15.00 7-20 15.00 5-20 0.68 Patient's condition 3.00 0-10 4.50 0-10 1.50 0-7 0.49 Caregiver status 38.00 19-60 37.00 15-45 27.50 0-40 0.00 Caregivers' perspective 27.00 11-30 27.00 13-30 22.00 15-28 0.30 Quality of care 18.00 2-20 18.50 10-20 15.50 9-20 0.26 Relationships 18.00 1-20 18.00 5-20 18.00 10-19 0.78 QOLLTI- total 118.00 68-160 113.50 68-133 100.00 49-120 0.06 * Kruskal-Wallis test

Table 5. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients Colombia 2023. n=190 Minimal depression n=112 Mild depression n=34 Moderate depression n=19Severe depression n=25p-value Median Min-max Median Min-max Median Min-max Median Min-max Environment17.00 2-20 15.00 1-20 14.00 8-20 13.00 5-19 <0.001 Patient's condition3.00 0-104.50 0-10 3.000-9 3.00 0-4 0.09Caregiver status 41.00 19-60 34.50 22-55 31.00 15-46 29.00 0-42 <0.001 Caregivers' perspective 28.00 13-30 27.00 13-30 20.00 14-30 16.00 11-25 <0.001 Quality of care 19.00 2-70 18.00 9-20 15.00 8-20 13.00 12-18 <0.001 Relationships 18.00 1-20 17.00 5-20 17.00 10-20 16.00 10-19 0.010 QOLLTI- total121.00 68-160 114.50 68-145 96.00 84-132 88.00 49-109 <0.001 * Kruskal-Wallis test

Discussion

Family caregivers of people with cancer in the study are mostly women who are caring for their parent, sibling, or spouse with cancer. They are working and responsible for caring for older adults, with limitations in developing self-care activities, similar to what has been reported in other studies8. The majority of this population belongs to the low and lower-middle socioeconomic strata, which limits their ability to care for themselves and their families due to the limited availability of resources. As in other studies, the caregivers have no experience or training in caregiving, are required to provide care for 12 hours per day, and most (although not all) have provided care for between 13 and more than 37 months, similar to what was reported in Ahmad Zubaidi et al.’s review18.

It should be noted that although 31.9% of caregivers have a defined religious practice and 77.4% are satisfied with this dimension, there is a significant percentage of dissatisfaction, which is striking when we consider that religious practice and the exercise of spirituality are considered factors that help to overcome negative aspects corresponding to the psychological dimension. This situation was also found in the study by Asano et al.19, where negative religious coping was associated with greater depressive symptoms, and many of the caregivers who experienced depression had it mitigated by positive religious coping. Similarly, other supports identified by caregivers, such as healthcare professionals, family members, and social institutions, are perceived as insufficient to meet the needs of caregivers of people with cancer.

Concerning family support, Rojas-García et al20. say in their study that families who have an adult relative with advanced cancer in palliative care face challenges that begin with accepting the diagnosis, changing family routines, and coping with the disease and circumstances that create different types of needs. This situation means that in addition to the caregiver, other family members are experiencing significant changes that may affect how they support the cancer patient’s caregiver.

In terms of anxiety, although scores are reported to be low, 22 caregivers have moderate or severe anxiety; some may be related to uncertainty about the future, as evidenced by anxiety, nervousness, and fear of losing control. Similarly, regarding depression scores, the majority of caregivers have mild depression; however, 44 caregivers have moderate or severe depression. The most prominent symptoms are related to sadness, pessimism about the future, loss of pleasure, guilty feelings, lack of self-confidence, self-criticalness, crying, lack of interest, indecisiveness, loss of energy, sleep problems, irritability, lack of appetite, tiredness and fatigue, and loss of interest in sex. Chakraborty et al.21 and Fauziah et al.22 found similar symptoms in caregivers participating in their respective studies.

These symptoms are related to the caregiver burden, which Guerrero-Gaviria et al.23 defined as a set of physical, psychological, and socioeconomic problems caused by the caregiving role that alters multiple aspects of daily life, such as interpersonal relationships, caregiving skills, emotional balance, and personal aspirations. In the case of the family caregivers in this study, changes in interpersonal relationships (as evidenced by lack of satisfaction with support received from others), changes in emotional balance, and personal aspirations (as evidenced by uncertainty about the future and perceptions of themselves and their caregiving) are evidence of caregiver strain. Lee et al.’s study24 shows a positive correlation between unmet needs and the burden of care. Health and psychological problems, family and social support, information, religious and spiritual needs, and practical support needs are some of the subdomains of unmet needs significantly correlated with the burden of care24.

Bivariate and multivariate analyses confirm how anxiety is associated with the caregiver’s state and how caregiver depression can affect all dimensions of the caregiver’s quality of life. Similar results were reported in the study by Washington et al.25, which described the comfort needs of family caregivers of outpatient cancer patients, such as understanding, self-efficacy, meaning-making, informal support, formal support, resources, and self-care, all of which correspond to five out of the eight domains of care identified by the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care’s Clinical Practice Guidelines. Along the same line, the review by Guerra-Martín et al.10 found that the more extended care was needed over time, the greater the tension and emotional burden of caregivers, resulting in poorer quality of life.

It is also important to mention how non-use of ICT by caregivers may be related to anxiety, something relevant considering that much of the information about caring for a family member with cancer is obtained primarily through the Internet or by calling peer caregivers or healthcare professionals. Likewise, it is also important to mention how the number of hours of care, the level of dependency, and the level of ICT proficiency become risk factors for the occurrence of depression. In this regard, studies such as Tay et al. highlight how the number of caregiving tasks and caregiver burden were associated with caregiver self-care behaviors.8 Studies such as Li et al.26 and Darley et al.27 show how e-health interventions are a convenient way to support informal caregivers of cancer patients and can mitigate depression and improve the quality of life for informal caregivers. However, it is important to note that these interventions did not significantly reduce the caregiver burden26,27.

All of the above leads us to think about the need to work on a dyadic cancer care model involving the cancer patient and the family caregiver. These cancer patient-caregiver dyads should be approached in an interdisciplinary manner so that patients and caregivers receive the necessary guidance, support, and training to address both cancer progress and instrumental care at home, as well as those related to the caregiver’s well-being and self-care. To the extent that caregivers are cared for, and their quality of life and well-being are ensured during this experience over time, there will be better outcomes in the quality of care received by cancer patients. Molassiotis and Wang28 agree on the need to develop psychoeducation, skills training, and therapeutic counseling interventions as they have the potential to help reduce the burden of care and address information needs and coping strategies. Health literacy is also being reintroduced to refer to the caregivers’ skills and competencies needed to use health information to make informed decisions28.

Conclusions

The characteristics of family caregivers of people with cancer align with those reported in previous studies: the majority are middle-aged women who provide over 12 hours of care daily to their partner or parent, often for more than a year. While most caregivers exhibited mild levels of depression and anxiety, some experienced moderate to severe symptoms, potentially leading to caregiver overburden and negatively affecting their quality of life. Protective factors identified in this study include a high level of education, average use of ICT, and sharing caregiving responsibilities, which nursing and interdisciplinary teams should consider. These findings highlight the need for targeted nursing interventions that not only address the patient’s needs but also actively support caregivers, thereby improving their quality of life. Enhancing the quality of nursing care for both patients and families in palliative cancer care could be achieved by integrating strategies that reduce caregiver burden and promote mental well-being.