# Remimazolam-etomidate versus remimazolam-propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

## TL;DR

This study found that remimazolam-etomidate is safer than remimazolam-propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, with fewer breathing and blood pressure issues.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence comparing two sedation combinations for gastrointestinal endoscopy, focusing on safety and efficacy.

## Key findings

- Remimazolam-etomidate reduced respiratory depression compared to remimazolam-propofol (20.0% vs. 32.3%).
- The RE group had fewer airway interventions and lower hypotension rates than the RP group.
- Both groups had low hypoxemia rates, but the RE group had fewer cases.

## Abstract

The optimal sedation strategy for gastrointestinal endoscopy remains debated. This study compared the efficacy and safety of remimazolam combined with etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

This single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed from March 2024 to April 2024. A total of 262 patients scheduled to undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remimazolam-etomidate (RE) or remimazolam-propofol (RP). The primary outcome was the incidence of respiratory depression. Secondary outcomes included the results of sedation and recovery. The safety results mainly include the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, painful injection and muscular tremor. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ² tests for group comparisons, with subgroup analyses and multivariable logistic regression to assess the robustness of primary outcome.

Respiratory depression occurred in 20.0% (25/125) of RE patients versus 32.3% (40/124) of RP patients (OR=0.52; 95% CI = 0.29–0.93; p = 0.028). There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the number of airway interventions between the two groups (p = 0.043), with 18 patients (14.5%) in the RP group requiring three airway interventions and only seven patients (5.6%) in the RE group. Hypoxemia occurred in three patients (2.4%) in the RE group and in five patients (4.0%) in the RP group. Hypotension was observed in 23.2% of patients sedated with RE versus 36.3% of patients sedated with RP (p = 0.024).

Remimazolam-etomidate demonstrated a superior safety profile, with reduced respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability compared to remimazolam-propofol, suggesting its potential as a safer alternative for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation.

This trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400085904) prior to patient enrollment.