Initial Implementation and Utilization of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing at a Pulmonary Department of an Academic Tertiary Care Center: An Overview

TL;DR

This study examines the early implementation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing at a pulmonary department, focusing on patient characteristics and test outcomes.

Contribution

The study provides insights into the initial integration of CPET in an academic center and factors influencing test performance.

Findings

Dyspnea was the most common reason for CPET testing, with test termination often due to leg discomfort or dyspnea.

Lower BMI, higher FVC % predicted, and greater minute ventilation were independently associated with achieving the anaerobic threshold.

Patients referred for cardiovascular disease were less likely to achieve the anaerobic threshold, regardless of institutional experience.

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool for assessing the integrated function of the cardiopulmonary and muscular systems during exercise. The initiation of a CPET program is complex, and data on early implementation in academic centers remain relatively limited. Objective: to evaluate the initial integration of CPET within a pulmonary department, focusing on patient demographics, referral indications, test performance, and factors associated with anaerobic threshold achievement. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care center, including all patients who underwent their first CPET between February 2016 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, and functional parameters were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with anaerobic threshold achievement, defined as a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥ 1.1. Results: The cohort included 434 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 14.1 years; 54% male; mean BMI 29.2 ± 5.6 kg/m2). The most common indication for testing was dyspnea (50%). Tests were most frequently terminated due to leg discomfort (39%) and dyspnea (38.8%). Achievement of RER ≥ 1.1 was independently associated with lower BMI (aOR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88–0.95; p < 0.001), higher FVC % predicted (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.03; p = 0.028), and greater minute ventilation volume (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01–1.03; p < 0.001), and it was less likely in patients referred for cardiovascular disease (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21–0.64; p < 0.001). No consistent temporal trend in RER achievement was observed across the study period. Conclusions: CPET was most commonly utilized in response to patient-reported dyspnea, with test termination frequently driven by subjective symptoms rather than objective clinical criteria. Anaerobic threshold achievement was more strongly associated with individual physiological characteristics than with institutional experience. These findings underscore the importance of patient preparation and pulmonary functional capacity in optimizing CPET performance.

Figures