SARS-CoV-2 Testing Behavior in Symptomatic Adults and the Role of Exposure Risk, Susceptibility and Healthcare Access in a U.S. National Cohort (2020–2023)
Jenna Sanborn, Saba Qasmieh, Kate Penrose, Angela Parcesepe, Yanhan Shen, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Josefina Nunez, Denis Nash, McKaylee Robertson

TL;DR
This study explores how U.S. adults with symptoms tested for SARS-CoV-2 from 2020–2023, finding that factors like exposure risk, health susceptibility, and healthcare access influenced testing frequency.
Contribution
The study identifies demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with infrequent SARS-CoV-2 testing among symptomatic individuals during the pandemic.
Findings
Infrequent testers were more likely to be female, Hispanic or Black/non-Hispanic, and have lower income or education.
Testing frequency was positively linked to vaccination, trust in public health, and willingness to take antivirals.
Those with higher exposure risk, susceptibility, or healthcare barriers were less likely to use at-home tests or request free tests.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of diagnostic testing for managing transmission and reducing the risk of serious illness. This study examines SARS-CoV-2 testing behavior patterns, including at-home and laboratory tests, among adults with COVID-like symptoms from 2020–2023. We explore characteristics associated with testing frequency and assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk, susceptibility to COVID-19 complications, and barriers to healthcare access on frequency of testing when ill. The CHASING COVID Cohort study comprises a diverse sample of U.S. adults, with data collected quarterly from March 2020 to December 2023. We categorized participants with COVID-like symptoms reported 2+ times (N = 3,929) as ‘frequent testers’ if they tested ≥ 66% of the time when symptomatic, ‘occasional testers’ if they tested > 33% and < 66% of the time, and ‘infrequent…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 and Mental Health
