# Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients: A Survey of Knowledge, Practices and Perceptions of Greek Physiotherapists

## TL;DR

Greek physiotherapists recognize the importance of early mobilization for critically ill patients but face barriers like hemodynamic instability and lack of communication.

## Contribution

This study explores Greek physiotherapists' knowledge, practices, and perceived barriers to early mobilization in ICU settings.

## Key findings

- Most physiotherapists consider early mobilization important but do not follow specific protocols.
- Common barriers include hemodynamic instability and ventilator incompatibility.
- Experienced physiotherapists do not view BMI or tubes as barriers.

## Abstract

Background/Objective: Early mobilization (EM) of critically ill patients is a feasible and safe intervention that limits the implications of bed rest and improves lung function. However, its limited implementation suggests a gap between the research evidence and clinical practice. It is widely accepted that early mobilization faces a variety of barriers. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of Greek physiotherapists on EM barriers and record their knowledge and practices. Methods: We conducted an electronic survey using the online platform “Microsoft Forms”, among critical care physiotherapists in 66 hospitals that had an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) department in Greece in 2024. We administered a questionnaire, developed based on valid and reliable international questionnaires, with the following domains: education and knowledge on early mobilization, practices, perception regarding EM, and perceived barriers to early mobilization. Results: A total of 126 Greek physical therapists participated. The majority of them worked in urban area hospitals and in a rotation schedule around all departments. Most physical therapists stated that early mobilization is a priority for the patient’s rehabilitation and an important factor in preventing the complications of bed rest. Yet, they do not use specific protocols. Most had knowledge of what EM involved and the international guidelines. The most common barriers reported were the hemodynamic instability and the incoherence with the ventilator. Dedicated physiotherapists singled out certain barriers like the presence of delirium and the lack of communication among ICU staff. Additionally, physiotherapists with more years of experience did not acknowledge tubes, connections, femoral lines and Body Mass Index (BMI) as barriers. Conclusions: Most Greek physiotherapists believe that early mobilization is crucial for the rehabilitation of critically ill patients. A significant percentage know the guidelines, yet they do not follow a specific protocol. Various barriers prevent its implementation, which depends on the patients, healthcare providers, and the overall process. Yet, It is recognized that practices and perceived barriers are influenced by experience and work schedule. Establishing clinical protocols is essential to facilitate the implementation of early mobilization and support patient rehabilitation. Future efforts should focus on designing strategies and EM protocols for physiotherapy in Greek ICUs. Also, we need to monitor changes in perceived barriers across other countries as focus on the matter via published studies and clinical seminars could lead to significant changes.