Association of Pathologic Response and Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Therapy

TL;DR

This study finds that adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves survival in pancreatic cancer patients who did not respond strongly to initial treatment.

Contribution

The study identifies that adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients who lack a major pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Findings

Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Patients without a major pathologic response, pN0, or R0 status benefited more from adjuvant chemotherapy.

The specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not significantly affect survival outcomes.

Abstract

The optimal treatment strategy following neoadjuvant therapy and curative resection in early-stage pancreatic cancer remains inconclusive. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of patients with curatively resected pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was associated with favorable survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses showed that ACT appeared to benefit patients who did not achieve a major pathologic response, pN0, or R0 status following neoadjuvant therapy, whereas those who achieved a major response with pN0/R0 showed no survival benefit. The specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (FOLFIRINOX vs. GEM-NAB) and changes in ACT from NACT did not significantly influence survival outcomes in our cohort.

Background: In patients with curatively resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), evidence supporting the benefit of additional adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) remains limited. We aim to identify favorable factors contributing to survival benefits in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after NACT. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NACT followed by curative surgical resection between 2008 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors contributing to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 230 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR, 62–72 years) were included. All patients underwent curative surgical resection. Of these, 42% received neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX (96/230), 15% received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) (34/230), and 43% received gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) (100/230). In univariate analysis, lower College of American Pathologists (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) (0–1 vs. 2–3, median DFS: 29.8 vs. 14.2 months, p = 0.0081) and receipt of ACT (Yes vs. No, median DFS: 22.2 vs. 12.4 months, p < 0.0001) demonstrated significant associations with superior DFS. Multivariable analysis identified receipt of ACT as an independent predictor of superior DFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39–0.78, p = 0.0007) and OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33–0.71, p = 0.0002). However, the NACT regimen (mFOLFIRINOX vs. GEM-NAB) and the transition between neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (de-escalation vs. continuation vs. change) did not correlate with DFS or OS. The duration of perioperative chemotherapy showed a trend toward improved survival outcomes, though not statistically significant (6 months vs. <6 months: DFS, 19.4 vs. 16.2 months, p = 0.1448; OS, 49.6 vs. 30.4 months, p = 0.0623). In the following subgroup analyses, receipt of ACT provided DFS/OS benefits in patients who did not achieve a major pathologic response, pN0, or R0 resection (DFS: p = 0.0003; OS: p < 0.0001). However, it did not provide DFS/OS benefits in those who achieved a major pathologic response with pN0/R0 to NACT (DFS: p = 0.8036; OS: p = 0.1877). Conclusions: In resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma following NACT, receiving ACT was associated with favorable survival outcomes. Additional ACT appears to benefit patients who did not achieve a major pathologic response (pN0 or R0) to neoadjuvant therapy, with limited benefit for those who achieved a major response with pN0/R0. The specific NACT regimen (mFOLFIRINOX vs. GEM-NAB) and changes in ACT from NACT did not significantly influence survival outcomes in our cohort.

Figures