Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Medicines Used for Bronchial Asthma in Children in Kazakhstan
Elmira Serikbayeva, Nizom Suyunov, Baurzhan Makhatov, Ainash Atimtaikyzy, Aigul Ibragimova, Maksuda Abdullaeva

TL;DR
This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of asthma treatments in children in Kazakhstan, finding that younger children have more cost-effective treatment regimens.
Contribution
The paper introduces a pharmacoeconomic analysis of asthma treatments in Kazakhstani children, highlighting age-specific cost-effectiveness differences.
Findings
The cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) for mild asthma was 0.077 in 6–8-year-olds and 0.171 in 9–12-year-olds.
Moderate asthma treatment had CERs of 0.27 and 0.35 for the younger and older age groups, respectively.
The most cost-effective treatment was observed in children aged 6–8 years across all asthma severities.
Abstract
This study aimed to calculate a pharmacoeconomic indicator, specifically the cost-effectiveness coefficient, for treating paediatric bronchial asthma with combined regimens of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids. This study involves 54 children aged 6 to 12 years, who were divided into 6 groups depending on the age and severity of bronchial asthma. Treatment effectiveness is calculated by subtracting the percentage difference between exacerbation frequency and the number of patients. The calculation of pharmacoeconomic data was conducted using the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER). For the treatment of mild bronchial asthma, the drug Berodual is used for inhalation through a nebuliser, moderate therapy is conducted using a combination of Flixotide and Salbutamol, and severe is stopped by a combination of Symbicort and Salbutamol. From the results obtained, notably, the CER for…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical studies and practices
