Vaccine effectiveness of inactivated and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine platform during Delta and Omicron wave in Jakarta, Indonesia: A test-negative case-control study
Erlina Burhan, Farchan Azzumar, Fira Alyssa Gabriella Sinuraya, Sabarinah Prasetyo, Dwi Gayatri, Iwan Ariawan, Muhammad Ilham Dhiya Rakasiwi, Hanna Lianti Afladhia, Ahmad Fadhil Ilham, Ihya Akbar, Elvan Wiyarta

TL;DR
This study compares the effectiveness of inactivated and mRNA vaccines against Delta and Omicron variants in Jakarta, Indonesia, finding that mRNA vaccines provided better protection during the Omicron wave.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence of vaccine effectiveness in a low- and middle-income country context with limited vaccine supply.
Findings
Inactivated vaccines offered 22.06% effectiveness against Delta infection and 78.55% against fatal cases.
mRNA vaccines showed 24.81% effectiveness against Omicron infection with a booster dose increasing effectiveness to 68.82%.
Inactivated vaccines provided little to no protection during the Omicron wave, while mRNA vaccines offered acceptable protection.
Abstract
Vaccination was included in the Indonesian government policy to address Delta and Omicron waves of SAR-CoV-2 infections. This study assesses the effectiveness of inactivated (CoronaVac, BBIBP-Cor) and mRNA vaccines (mRNA-1273, BNT162b2) against COVID-19 regardless of symptoms and fatal COVID-19 (mortality within 30 days after confirmed RT-PCR) during Delta and Omicron period in Jakarta, Indonesia. This study case-control, test-negative study included all individuals aged over 18 years in Jakarta with complete and consistent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results from 1 June to 31 August 2021 (Delta period) and 1 January to 2 April 2022 (Omicron period), as well as complete vaccination status. This study integrates several public health data from the Jakarta provincial government. From the odds ratio, vaccine effectiveness (VE) was analyzed as the primary outcome using unmatched analysis, matched…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Hepatitis B Virus Studies
