# Portion Estimation, Satiety Perception and Energy Intake Following Different Breakfast Portion Sizes in Healthy Adults

**Authors:** Kinga Kwiecien, Lourdes Santos‐Merx, Tarsem Sahota, Helen Coulthard, Mariasole Da Boit

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12733 · Nutrition Bulletin · 2025-02-05

## TL;DR

This study shows that eating a small breakfast makes people feel hungrier and eat more snacks later, even if total daily calories stay the same.

## Contribution

The study reveals that small breakfast portions may lead to compensatory snacking on energy-dense foods.

## Key findings

- Small breakfast portions were rated as least filling and led to higher hunger and snacking later.
- Total daily energy intake remained unchanged across different breakfast portion sizes.
- Participants accurately predicted satiety from breakfast images but compensated with snacks after small portions.

## Abstract

Expected satiety is a key element in predicting meal portion size and food consumption; however, how this can be affected by different breakfast portion sizes is unknown. The study examined the impact of different breakfast portions on satiety, portion size, and energy intake and comprised an online survey and an experimental intervention. Sixteen adults (9 women, BMI: 24.9 ± 4.3 kg/m2) rated images of three portion sizes (small, standard, large) of the same breakfast using an ordinal scale. Subsequently, they were asked to self‐prepare and consume ad libitum the three breakfast portions in a randomised order on different days and to complete a food diary. Satiety and portion size perception were re‐measured upon consumption of each breakfast. For both the visual image and breakfast consumption, the small breakfast portion was rated as the smallest and least filling, while the large portion was rated as the largest and most filling (p < 0.05). When consuming the small breakfast, participants reported being hungrier and less full between breakfast and lunch (p < 0.05) and had a higher energy intake from lunch onward, due to more snacking (p < 0.05). However, the total daily energy intake was not different among the three breakfast portion sizes. Individuals seemed accustomed to predicting satiety and portion size from images. The consumption of the small breakfast was judged as not filling enough and was accompanied by a higher energy intake via energy‐dense snacks. Based on these preliminary findings, breakfast size reduction may lead to unhealthy compensatory energy intake by snacking on energy‐dense foods.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12147059/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12147059/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12147059/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12147059