Reply to Siqueira-Batista and Gómez: Underscoring the importance of biosafety for the return of Martian samples
Charles W. Whetsel, Joel S. Levine, Stephen J. Hoffman, Erik L. Antonsen

Abstract
- —NASA (NASA)100000104
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlanetary Science and Exploration · Spaceflight effects on biology · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
The authors strongly endorse the protection of the Earth’s biosphere against harmful biological contamination by potential extraterrestrial life or bioactive molecules using the principle of assured containment for return of any unsterilized Martian materials until the prospects of future samples containing unidentified microorganisms are better understood, a point underscored by Siqueira-Batista, et al. (1). While not discussed in detail in our recent paper (2), the literature shows that such a principle has been and remains central to the planning by NASA and ESA for the robotic return of Martian samples, such as those collected to date by the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover mission (3????–8), as well as in the conduct of scientific investigations following the return of such samples and in the protocols for how such samples should be handled and characterized related to biosafety concerns and their implications for future missions to Mars (3?–5, 9, 10).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1R. Siqueira-Batista, F. Gómez, Martian samples, hazards and biosecurity: Between science and bioethics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122, e 2507961122 (2025).40424124 10.1073/pnas.2507961122 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2C. Whetsel , Utilizing martian samples for future planetary exploration—characterizing hazards and resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122, e 2404251121 (2025), 10.1073/pnas.2404251121.39761405 PMC 11745335 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3D. De Vincenzi, M. S. Race, H. P. Klein, Planetary protection, sample return missions and Mars exploration: History, status, and future needs. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 103, 28577–28585 (1998), 10.1029/98JE 01600. · doi ↗
- 4M. S. Race, Mars sample return and planetary protection in a public context. Adv. Space Res. 22, 391–399 (1998), 10.1016/S 0273-1177(98)00036-2. · doi ↗
- 5B. Uhran, C. Conley, J. A. Spry, Updating planetary protection considerations and policies for Mars sample return. Space Policy 49, 101322 (2019), 10.1016/j.spacepol.2019.04.001. · doi ↗
- 6M. Cooper , Planetary protection implementation and verification approach for the Mars 2020 mission. Astrobiology 23, 825–834 (2023), 10.1089/ast.2022.0046.37405744 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7G. Cataldo , The planetary protection strategy of Mars sample return’s Earth return orbiter mission. J. Space Saf. Eng. 11, 374–384 (2024), 10.1016/j.jsse.2024.04.013. · doi ↗
- 8E. Craven , Biological safety in the context of backward planetary protection and Mars sample return: Conclusions from the Sterilization Working Group. Int. J. Astrobiol. 20, 1–28 (2021), 10.1017/S 1473550420000397. · doi ↗
