# The Impact of Household Dysfunction on Dating Violence Perpetration Among Adolescents in the United States: A Scoping Review

**Authors:** Sumaita Choudhury, Melissa F. Peskin, Timothy J. Walker, Emily T. Hébert, Nivedhitha Parthasarathy, Kaitlyn L. Zajack-Garcia, Lea Sacca, Christine M. Markham

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/15248380241277267 · Trauma, Violence & Abuse · 2024-09-19

## TL;DR

This review explores how household dysfunction affects dating violence among U.S. adolescents, highlighting gaps in measurement and the need for better tools.

## Contribution

The study provides a scoping review of existing research on the link between household dysfunction and adolescent dating violence perpetration in the U.S.

## Key findings

- Most studies found that witnessing intimate partner violence is strongly linked to dating violence perpetration in adolescents.
- Family conflict was also identified as a significant predictor of dating violence in three out of four studies that evaluated it.
- Current measures of household dysfunction are not comprehensive, suggesting a need for improved assessment tools.

## Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences, such as household dysfunction (HD), play a central role in how adolescents establish, experience, and navigate the challenges of relationship formation, maintenance, and dissolution. HD exposures have been independently associated with dating violence (DV) perpetration in both adolescents and adults. However, research examining the association between the concurrent effect of HD on DV perpetration, especially among adolescents remains scarce. Thus, we conducted a scoping review to accumulate and summarize existing research regarding the impact of HD on DV perpetration among adolescents aged 10 to 17 years in the United States. We used three electronic databases, Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO, and EMBASE, to search for studies published in English between 2013 and August 2023. A total of 14 studies were retained for this review after full-text screening. Most of the included studies (64%) were longitudinal. Concerning HD measurement, 71% of studies evaluated witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV), and the remaining 29% assessed family conflict, both using different instruments. Regarding DV measurement, 43% of studies utilized the Safe Dates Abuse measures to assess various forms of DV perpetration. Findings from 3/4 (75%) studies that evaluated family conflict found it to be a significant predictor of DV perpetration. Additionally, 8/10 (80%) studies that assessed exposure to IPV reported significant associations with various forms of DV perpetration among adolescents. None of the included studies measured HD comprehensively; thus, measurement development is imperative. Findings from this review may help initiate the development of a more comprehensive HD measure, promote early intervention, and foster resilience among adolescents.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** HD (MESH:D006331), IPV (MESH:C563733)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12145481/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12145481/full.md

## References

62 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12145481/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12145481