# Short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer

## TL;DR

This study compares robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, finding fewer complications and shorter hospital stays with the robotic method, but similar long-term outcomes.

## Contribution

The study provides a direct comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

## Key findings

- Robot-assisted LLND had significantly fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays.
- 3-year relapse-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups.
- No oncological concerns were observed with robot-assisted surgery.

## Abstract

The lateral pelvic cavity is an anatomically tricky site to access using a linear approach; therefore, robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) may be superior over existing laparoscopic procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted LLND (R-LLND) versus laparoscopic LLND (L-LLND) for locally advanced low rectal cancer and explore the potential advantages of robot-assisted surgery.

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into L-LLND and R-LLND groups. The short- and long-term outcomes of the procedures were compared.

There were 41 patients in the L-LLND group and 21 in the R-LLND group. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the R-LLND group (49% vs. 19%, p = 0.029), especially urinary retention (29% vs. 5%, p = 0.046). The median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the R-LLND group (22 vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates in the L-LLND and R-LLND groups were 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.9–85.9) and 65.7% (95% CI: 30.7–86.1), respectively. No significant differences were observed in long-term survival outcomes.

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent TME plus R-LLND had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to those who underwent TME plus L-LLND. The long-term outcomes were comparable, and no oncological concerns associated with R-LLND were observed.