# Surgical outcomes after reoperation of intra-articular proximal ulna fractures

**Authors:** Nadia Azib, Huub H. de Klerk, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom, Abhiram R. Bhashyam

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.017 · JSES International · 2025-01-23

## TL;DR

This study examines the outcomes of reoperation for complex proximal ulna fractures, finding that while motion improves in some cases, many patients face complications.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into surgical outcomes and complication rates after reoperation for intra-articular proximal ulna fractures.

## Key findings

- 25% of patients underwent reoperation, most commonly due to symptomatic hardware.
- Reoperation for stiffness improved elbow motion, but 35% of patients experienced complications.
- Persistent implant irritation and tendinopathy were the most common complications.

## Abstract

Literature on outcomes after reoperation for intra-articular proximal ulna fractures is lacking, even though reoperation rates for these fractures are reportedly one of the highest of any anatomic site, ranging from 22%-89%. This study aims to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and complication rates after reoperation for these fractures.

In this retrospective single institution cohort study, we identified 134 patients with intra-articular, comminuted fractures of the proximal ulna initially treated with open reduction internal fixation between January 2015 and March 2022. Of this cohort, 34 of the 134 patients (25%) underwent reoperation. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to assess differences between preoperative and postoperative ROM.

Symptomatic hardware was the most common indication for reoperation (28/34 [82%]), followed by ulnar neuropathy (4/34 [12%]). ROM remained similar before and after reoperation for patients who underwent reoperation for indications other than stiffness. Patients that were reoperated for stiffness showed a 9° (P = .03) improvement in extension and 26° (P = .02) improvement for flexion. Twelve patients experienced complications, of which persistent implant irritation (3/12 [25%]) and tendinopathy (3/12 [25%]) were the most common.

In our study cohort, 25% of patients underwent reoperation—most often due to symptomatic hardware. While ROM is typically preserved after reoperation and improved when the indication for reoperation is elbow stiffness, a significant proportion of patients (35%) experience subsequent complications. Counseling patients about reoperation outcomes is essential to manage patient expectations and can help them make informed decisions. This approach supports informed decision-making and optimizes patient care.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tendinopathy (MESH:D052256), fractures (MESH:D050723), elbow stiffness (MESH:D000092464), ulnar neuropathy (MESH:D020424), stiffness (MESH:C566112), irritation (MESH:D001523), ulna fractures (MESH:D014458)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12144971/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12144971/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12144971/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12144971