Correction: ANGPTL8 is a negative regulator in pathological cardiac hypertrophy
Lin Hu, Jiarui Wei, Yue Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Junming Tang, Jian Tang, Yujiu Gao, Xiaoqiao Zhang, Yifan Li, Yantong Liu, Shinan Ma, Xingrong Guo, Qiufang Zhang
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLipid metabolism and disorders · Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Correction to: Cell Death and Disease 10.1038/s41419-022-05029-8, published online 18 July 2022
We mistakenly used incorrect duplicated DAPI immunostaining images within two group (sham vs TAC, same DAPI single image in TAC group) in Figure 1F, actually, we only mistakenly placed the DAPI existed in the sham group into the TAC group, merge channels of two group were correct, we also replaced the originally corrected DAPI staining in TAC group. This does not impact the conclusions of our experiment.
In addition to this, we acknowledge an error in figure labeling: the β-MHC bands in Figures 4I and 7G were inadvertently duplicated. Importantly, both experiments were actulally conducted under identical conditions(Ctr, AngII,rANGPTL8 and AngII+ANGPTL8), so the observed trends of β-MHC in both experimental groups are consistent, we have corrected the different bands in Figures 4I, this correction does not impact the conclusions of our experiment and the conclusions remain fully supported by the independent replicates (n = 3) confirmed the observed trends in both experimental groups in our previous submitted western blot at our online version of manuscript.
Original data (Figure 1F)
Amended file_figure 1
Original data (Figure 4I)
Amended file-figure 4
The original article has been corrected.