# Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) mentally represent collaboration?: Action-learning and communication in a partnered task

## TL;DR

This study explores whether chimpanzees mentally represent collaboration by examining their behavior in a partnered task involving action-learning and communication.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel method to investigate co-representation in chimpanzees using a sequential task with human and non-social partners.

## Key findings

- Chimpanzees in the partnered condition replicated the experimenter's action, suggesting mental representation of collaboration.
- Subjects in the non-social condition used alternative methods to achieve the same goal.
- Chimpanzees produced communicative gestures more often after exhausting their own actions.

## Abstract

Non-human primates engage in complex collective behaviours, but existing research does not paint a clear picture of what individuals cognitively represent when they act together. This study investigates chimpanzees’ capacity for co-representation. If individuals represent others’ actions as they relate to their own during a collaborative task, they should more easily learn to reproduce that action when their roles are switched. In a between-subjects design, we trained ten chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a sequential task, in which the first action is performed by either a human partner or a non-social object, and the second action is performed by the subject. We then imposed a breakdown in the action sequence, in which subjects could perform both actions themselves, but received no help from the experimenter or object. We measured subjects’ success in reproducing the first action in the sequence, as well as their attempts to recruit the experimenter’s help using requesting gestures. We found no overall difference in subjects’ ability to perform the first action in the sequence, but we observed significant qualitative differences in their solutions: individuals in the partnered condition replicated the experimenter’s action, while those in the non-social condition achieved the same end using alternative methods. This difference in solution style could indicate that only those chimpanzees in the partnered condition mentally represented the experimenter’s action during the collaborative task. We caution, however, that given the small number of subjects who solved the task, this result could also be driven by individual differences. We also found that subjects consistently produced communicative gestures toward the experimenter, but were more likely to do so after exhausting all actions they could take alone. We suggest that these patterns of behaviour highlight a number of key empirical considerations for the study of coordination in non-human primates.