This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
Retraction Note: BRD9 inhibition promotes PUMA-dependent apoptosis and augments the effect of imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Jianfeng Mu, Xuezeng Sun, Zhipeng Zhao, Hao Sun, Pengda Sun

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment · Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy · Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Retraction Note to: Cell Death and Disease 10.1038/s41419-021-04186-6, published online 19 October 2021
The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article because of concerns regarding the figures presented in this work. These concerns call into question the article’s overall scientific soundness. An investigation conducted after its publication discovered the following issues:
- Panels #3, Normal and #3, GIST in Figure 1A appear to overlap, when rotated, with Panels #1, Normal and #2, Tumor in Figure 1A in [1];
- Panel Untreated, WT in Figure 4D appears to overlap with Panel PUMA-KO, Untreated in Figure 6C in [2];
- Panel Untreated, PUMA-KO in Figure 4D appears to overlap, when rotated, with Panel WT, Untreated in Figure 6C in [2];
- Panels Untreated, WT and GSK-602, PUMA-KO in Figure 4E appear to overlap, when rotated, with Panels UT, PUMA-KD and trametinib, PUMA-KD in Figure 6D in [3].
The panels in question represent tissues taken from animals subject to different experimental conditions. The Editors-in-Chief therefore no longer have confidence in the integrity of the research presented in this article.
The authors have not replied to correspondence from the Publisher about this retraction.
