# In vitro measurement of proton RBE: A multi-centric comparison using a harmonized setup

**Authors:** Olga Sokol, Anders Tobias Frederiksen, Mateusz Sitarz, Brita Singers Sørensen, Elham Santina, Christopher Smith, John-William Warmenhoven, Marie Davídková, Anna Jelínek Michaelidesová, Irina Danilová, Oldřich Zahradníček, Amélia Maia Leite, Ludovic de Marzi, Frederic Pouzoulet, Paweł Olko, Justyna Miszczyk, Barbara Orzechowska, Eleftherios Papalanis, Mehran Hariri, Diana Spiegelberg, Bo Stenerlöw, Alexandru Dasu, Elisabeth Bodenstein, Elke Beyreuther, Jörg Pawelke, Dorothee Pfitzmann, Karen Kirkby, Nicholas Henthorn, Marco Durante

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100978 · Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology · 2025-05-11

## TL;DR

This study compared proton radiation effects across multiple labs using a shared setup, finding significant variability despite standardized methods.

## Contribution

The study reveals the extent of inter-center variability in proton RBE measurements under harmonized experimental conditions.

## Key findings

- Significant inter-institutional variability was observed in survival measurements, especially at the distal edge of the proton field.
- RBE values showed expected trends but with discrepancies between centers.
- The study highlights challenges in harmonizing multi-center radiobiological experiments.

## Abstract

•This study evaluated cell survival and proton RBE using a harmonized protocol.•Experiments were conducted across European centers with a single cell line.•Data variability was observed despite standardized procedures and shared phantoms.•The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of literature data.

This study evaluated cell survival and proton RBE using a harmonized protocol.

Experiments were conducted across European centers with a single cell line.

Data variability was observed despite standardized procedures and shared phantoms.

The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of literature data.

This study presents a multi-center comparison of in vitro cell survival measurements and RBE calculations following proton irradiations conducted under harmonized experimental conditions across six European institutions participating in the INSPIRE framework.

V79-4 cells were irradiated using spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) proton fields of two configurations delivering 6 and 8 Gy with widths of 6 and 4 cm, respectively. Each center adhered to a standardized protocol, utilizing the same phantom design to minimize uncertainties related to sample positioning. X-ray reference irradiations were also performed to assess cell radiosensitivity across the participating centers.

Despite the consistent protocol, significant inter-institutional variability was observed in the survival measurements. For both treatment plans, the largest variation was detected in the most distal points of the SOBP (coefficients of variation of 43 % and 60 % for the 6 Gy and 8 Gy plans, respectively). Kruskal-Wallis statistical test confirmed the significant differences between the centers for each of the measured position in the proton field for both SOBP configurations. Discrepancies were observed in calculated RBE data as well, albeit preserving the expected trend for the values to slightly increase towards the distal edge of the SOBP (up to 1.5 and 1.3 for the 6 Gy and 8 Gy plans, respectively).

The results of the study highlight the minimal biological variation one could expect performing proton RBE measurements in well-aligned experimental conditions and challenges in conducting large-scale, multi-center radiobiological experiments and inter-comparisons between literature data sets.

## Full-text entities

- **Cell lines:** V79-4 — Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_2796)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12141100/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12141100/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12141100/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12141100