Bridging studies in wild animal species and humans to better understand, assist, and control reproduction
Pierre Comizzoli, Richard J. Paulson

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Biology and Fertility · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Reproductive processes of wild animal species stand as a perfect illustration of nature's diversity. This special issue offers to explore intriguing connections between research efforts on wild animal species and human fertility as well as the potential to drive innovative solutions to shared challenges. Although human reproductive medicine and animal reproduction are traditionally viewed as distinct fields, there is growing recognition that these domains are deeply intertwined from endocrinology to assisted reproduction (1, 2, 3). This special issue aims to catalyze dialogue and collaboration among researchers studying reproduction across species. Experts in various wild animal species were asked to reflect on lessons learned from reproduction and fertility studies in their respective fields and how it may help human reproductive medicine.
Comparative studies provide invaluable insights into the evolutionary pressures shaping reproductive strategies and highlight fundamental biological principles that go beyond species boundaries. Articles in this special issue on amphibians (authored by Vance Trudeau), birds (by George Bentley), koalas (by Steve Johnston), rhinos (by Suzannah Williams), and marine mammals (by Michelle Shero) underscore this point. Unique reproductive traits encountered in nature but not in humans, such as embryonic diapause in some mammalian species (4) or the absence of reproductive aging (5), could provide an invaluable source of inspiration to address infertility issues in humans. The article by Anneke Moresco also highlights the comparative values in the study of pathologies affecting the reproductive system.
Emerging technologies, such as gene editing, stem cell–based gametogenesis, and bioengineered reproductive tissues, hold immense promise for advancing both human and animal reproductive health. Two articles feature some of these advances: stem cell technologies (authored by Ashlee Hutchinson) and microbiomes associated with the reproductive tract and the mammary glands (by Sally Bornbusch).
Additionally, assisted reproductive technologies combined with gamete and embryo cryopreservation have revolutionized human fertility treatments. Those technologies also show promise in biodiversity conservation efforts. However, advances owe much to foundational research conducted in nonhuman species, from laboratory rodents to livestock. Conversely, wildlife conservation efforts frequently adapt assisted reproductive technology techniques developed in humans, such as gamete preservation and artificial insemination, to endangered species and their preservation (3). The reciprocal flow of knowledge between disciplines illustrates the power of collaborative and integrative research. The article by Alexandre Silva on gonadal tissue biobanking and in vitro culture is a good example of possible collaborations in that field.
Human and animal reproductive systems face diverse threats, including environmental toxins, climate change, habitat loss, and stress. These factors impact fertility rates, gestation success, and offspring survival. In wildlife populations, reproductive challenges threaten biodiversity and ecosystem stability. In humans, infertility is a rising concern, with one in six couples worldwide experiencing difficulty conceiving. Understanding the parallels between species can uncover shared vulnerabilities and pave the way for targeted interventions. The study of hormonal regulation, reproductive timing, and gamete quality across species has revealed surprising commonalities. For example, research on endocrine-disrupting chemicals has shown similar mechanisms of action in humans and wildlife, demonstrating how pollutants disrupt reproductive health universally. These findings also reinforce the need for policies that protect reproductive health at the ecosystem level. The article by Mary Ann Ottinger about the exposome is a good illustration about the need to jointly consider wildlife and human reproductive health since animal species often share the same environment and face the same issues related to changes. The last article in this Special Issue by Mayako Fujihara presents the possibility to increase collaborative efforts between human and wildlife biobanks to build a new concept of One Reproductive Health.
In some cases, controlling the reproduction of certain wild animal populations becomes necessary to maintain ecological balance and protect human interests. This is particularly true in scenarios where overpopulation leads to habitat destruction, human-wildlife conflict, or the spread of disease. Methods such as immunocontraception and sterilization are being explored as humane and effective solutions. Nonetheless, these measures raise important ethical questions about our role in nature and the long-term impacts of such interventions.
Whether safeguarding the genetic diversity of a threatened species or developing therapies for human infertility, the bridges between disciplines have the potential to transform reproductive science and its applications. We invite the reader to explore the different contributions, which highlight cutting-edge research, innovative technologies, and thought-provoking discussions. By sharing methodologies, data, and perspectives, we can accelerate progress in understanding the complexities of reproduction and addressing its challenges. Together, we can build a vision of reproductive science without boundaries, fostering a deeper understanding of life itself.
CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement
Pierre Comizzoli: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Richard J. Paulson: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of Interests
P.C. has nothing to disclose. R.J.P. has nothing to disclose.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Comizzoli P.Paulson E.E.Mc Ginnis L.K.The mutual benefits of research in wild animal species and human-assisted reproduction J Assist Reprod Genet 3520185515602947070210.1007/s 10815-018-1136-2PMC 5949116 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Marlatt V.L.Bayen S.Castaneda-Cortès D.Delbès G.Grigorova P.Langlois V.S.Impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals on reproduction in wildlife and humans Environ Res 208202211258410.1016/j.envres.2021.11258434951986 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Paulson R.J.Comizzoli P.Addressing challenges in developing and implementing successful in vitro fertilization in endangered species: an opportunity for humanity to “give back”Fertil Steril 10920184184192952647810.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.031 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Comizzoli P.New directions to understand and learn from embryonic diapause in mammals Biosci Proc 102020
- 5Comizzoli P.Ottinger M.A.Understanding reproductive aging in wildlife to improve animal conservation and human reproductive health Front Cell Dev Biol 9202168047110.3389/fcell.2021.680471 PMC 817001634095152 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
