# Do the “big four” orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?

**Authors:** Pierre J Février, Timothy G Barraclough

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qraf005 · Evolution Letters · 2025-03-06

## TL;DR

This paper investigates whether four major insect orders show consistent evolutionary patterns in protein-coding genes.

## Contribution

It proposes that some higher taxa may represent evolutionarily significant units with coherent selection patterns.

## Key findings

- Selection on protein-coding genes is conserved within insect orders but differs between them.
- GC content variation at codon 2nd positions suggests selection drives these patterns.
- Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera show coherent selection patterns, unlike Coleoptera and Diptera.

## Abstract

Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.

Higher taxa are normally considered to be arbitrary levels in the branching tree of life, with no level having greater or lesser significance for evolutionary processes than any other. But are some higher taxa more significant than others for evolution? This article asks whether the big four orders of holometabolous insects comprise evolutionarily significant units showing divergent but internally conserved patterns of selection on protein-coding genes.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Coleoptera (taxon 7041), Diptera (taxon 7147), Hymenoptera (taxon 7399), Lepidoptera (taxon 7088)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** amino (-), amino acid (MESH:D000596), chitin (MESH:D002686), essential amino acids (MESH:D000601)
- **Species:** Chiroptera (bats, order) [taxon 9397], Hymenoptera (hymenopterans, order) [taxon 7399]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12137047/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12137047/full.md

## References

85 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12137047/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12137047