# Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states

## TL;DR

This study finds that between 11.6% and 20.2% of women in four U.S. states have attended crisis pregnancy centers, which promote abstinence and oppose abortion.

## Contribution

The study provides the first population-level estimates of crisis pregnancy center attendance among reproductive-aged women in the U.S.

## Key findings

- CPC attendance prevalence ranged from 11.6% in New Jersey to 20.2% in Arizona.
- Demographic factors like age, race, and socioeconomic status were not consistently linked to CPC attendance in most states.
- The study highlights the need for ongoing monitoring as reproductive healthcare access changes.

## Abstract

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) typically hold missions of preventing abortion, opposing contraception, and promoting abstinence outside of marriage. They often lack transparency about their services, posing as medical facilities or even as abortion clinics. Given the lack of evidence on the extent to which people use crisis pregnancy centers, we sought to quantify the prevalence of ever attendance at a CPC among adult, reproductive-aged women from Survey of Women data from four states.

We analyzed cross-sectional data from population-representative surveys conducted among adult, reproductive-age women in 2018–2019 in Iowa (N = 2,425) and in 2019–2020 in Arizona (N = 2,132), New Jersey (N = 2,132), and Wisconsin (N = 2,095). Using survey weights, we calculated the prevalences of ever CPC attendance among those with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy. We focused on this subset as this comprises the women who might have had cause to attend a CPC. We also used Poisson regression to test associations between demographic correlates and ever attendance by state.

Prevalence of ever CPC attendance in adult, reproductive-age women with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy was statistically significantly higher in Arizona (20.2%; 95% CI, 17.6%-23.1%) compared to Iowa (14.5%; 95% CI, 12.6%-16.7%), Wisconsin (14.3%; 95% CI, 12.1%-16.8%).), and New Jersey (11.6%; 95% CI, 9.6%-13.8%). Age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were not correlated with ever CPC attendance among women with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy in Arizona, Iowa, and New Jersey. In Wisconsin, prevalence was lower among those in the lowest socioeconomic stratum.

Ever attendance at CPCs is not rare, ranging from 11.6%-20.2% in the four states evaluated. The present study serves as an important baseline given that the prevalence may change as pregnancy options become increasingly restricted.