Corrigendum to “Measuring the decent work of knowledge workers: Constructing and validating a new scale” [Heliyon Volume 9, Issue 7, July 2023, Article e17945]
Yan Yan, Yuqing Geng, Juan Gao
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmployment and Welfare Studies · Digital Economy and Work Transformation
In this article, the authors omitted the ethical approval number and date that approval was obtained from the ethical statement in this publication, which is required under the policies of the journal. The authors confirm that ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Dianji University, for the research under the following reference number: 2022031201, dated 12^th^ March 2022.
The original ethics statement in the article can be found below:
3.2. Ethics statement
According to the related provisions of the human survey, this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Dianji University. All participants were given oral consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. In the process of investigation, we told the interviewees that all the oral and written materials would be recorded and kept confidential. All participants were conducted anonymously, and the results will be used for academic research only, not for commercial purposes. We fully respected the wishes of the interviewees.
The statement has been updated to include the ethical approval reference number and date.
The correct version of the ethics statement should be as below:
3.2. Ethics statement
According to the related provisions of the human survey, this study wasreviewed and**approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Dianji Universitywith the approval reference number: 2022031201, dated 12^th^March 2022*. All participants were given oral consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. In the process of investigation, we told the interviewees that all the oral and written materials would be recorded and kept confidential. All participants were conducted anonymously, and the results will be used for academic research only, not for commercial purposes. We fully respected the wishes of the interviewees*.
The authors apologize for the errors.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.