Clostridium butyricum: a promising approach to enhancing intestinal health in poultry
Xiaopeng Tang, Yan Zeng, Meijun Li

TL;DR
Clostridium butyricum improves intestinal health in poultry by balancing gut bacteria, strengthening the intestinal barrier, and boosting immunity, leading to better growth and production.
Contribution
This paper highlights the novel mechanisms by which Clostridium butyricum enhances intestinal health and production performance in poultry.
Findings
C. butyricum promotes a balanced intestinal microbiota by inhibiting harmful bacteria and supporting beneficial ones.
It strengthens the intestinal barrier by improving tight junction integrity and reducing permeability.
Administration of C. butyricum improves feed conversion, weight gain, and overall production performance in poultry.
Abstract
The intestinal tract is essential for the overall health and productivity of animals, including poultry. Clostridium butyricum (C. butyricum) is a probiotic bacterium that has been shown to be a promising candidate for improving intestinal function and subsequently optimizing poultry growth. The beneficial effects of C. butyricum on intestinal health can be attributed to several key mechanisms. First, it helps maintain the balance of the intestinal microbiota by inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria and promoting the proliferation of beneficial bacteria. This microbial homeostasis is essential for efficient nutrient digestion and absorption. Second, C. butyricum enhances the integrity of the intestinal barrier. It enhances the integrity of epithelial tight junctions, reducing the permeability of the intestinal mucosa and preventing the invasion of pathogenic substances. Furthermore,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Poultry | Optimal added amount | Experimental period | Production performance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | FBW↑, ADG↑, F/G↓ | Cao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.0 × 107 or 3.0 × 107 CFU/kg | 42 days | ADG↑ | Yang et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.0 × 107 CFU/kg | 28 days | FBW↑, ADG↑ | Zhang et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.0 × 108 CFU/kg | 22 days | ADG↑, FCR↓ | Xu et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 40 days | no effects | Zhang et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.5 × 109 CFU/kg (1–21 d); 5 × 109 CFU/kg (22–42 d) | 42 days | FBW↑, ADG↑, a*24h↑, pH24h↑, drip loss↓, shear force↓ | Li et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | FBW↑, ADG↑, FCR↓ | Li et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 28 days | FBW↑ | Xu et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.0 × 107 CFU/kg | 28 days | FBW↑ | Zhang et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.5 × 107 or 5.0 × 107 CFU/kg | 42 days | FBW↑, ADG↑, FCR↓ | Cao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 106 CFU/kg | 42 days | no effects | Han et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | ADFI↑, ADG↑ | Zhao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.5 × 108 CFU/kg, 5 × 108 CFU/kg, 1 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | ADG↑ | Liao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.5 × 108 CFU/kg, 5 × 108 CFU/kg, 1 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | meat quality↑, breast muscle yield↑, fatty acid composition↑ | Liao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 100 g/t (1.0 × 108 CFU/kg) | 42 days | FI↓, F/G↓ | Liu et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 4 × 108 CFU/kg | 39 days | FBW↑, ADG↑, | Yang et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | ADG↑ | Zhao et al. ( |
| Broiler chickens | 2.5 × 108 CFU/kg | 42 days | ADG↑, F/G↓ | Takahashi et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 1.0 × 108 CFU/kg | 28 days | average egg weight↑, eggshell weight↑, tibia index↑ | Huang et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 0.02% | 84 days | mortality rate↓, average egg weight↑, egg mass↑, egg production rate↑, feed efficiency↑, eggshell quality↑, Haugh unit↑, thick albumen content↑, albumen height↑ | Obianwuna et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 0.5 g/kg | 40 days | ADFI↓, FCR↓, eggshell strength↓, yolk color↓, albumen CP↑ | Xiang et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 63 days | laying rate↑, egg mass↑, feed/egg↓, albumen height↑, eggshell thickness↑ | Wang et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 5.0 × 107 CFU/kg | 70 days | egg production rate↑, egg mass↑, eggshell strength↑ | Zhan et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 0.02% | 84 days | egg production rate↑, average egg weight↑, egg mass↑, ADFI↑, damaged eggs↓, eggshell quality↑, Haugh unit↑, thick albumen con-tent↑, albumen height↑ | Obianwuna et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 0.9 g/kg (8.37 × 108 CFU/kg) | 56 days | FCR↓, yolk color↑ | Wang et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 56 days | egg mass↑, pre-grade yellow follicle number↑, yolk properties↑, albumen height↑, Haugh unit↑ | Wang et al. ( |
| Laying hens | 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg | 56 days | ADFI↓, feed to egg ratio↓, eggshell ratio↑ | Liu et al. ( |
| Pekin ducks | 400 mg/kg | 42 days | ABW↑, ADG↑, F/G↓ | Liu et al. ( |
| Pekin ducks | 200, 400, or 600 mg/kg | 42 days | ADG↑, F/G↓, meat quality↑ | Liu et al. ( |
| Muscovy ducks | 1 mL (2 × 109 CFU/mL) | 3 days | no effects | Xiao et al. ( |
| Cherry Valley ducks | 1.0 × 109 CFU/kg | 42 days | no effects | Zhang et al. ( |
| Goose | 250 mg/kg (3.0 × 106 CFU/g) | 70 days | ADG↑ | Yu et al. ( |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology · Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health · Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Introduction
Poultry husbandry not only serves as a valuable source of protein for human consumption but also plays a crucial role in agricultural production, contributing significantly to agricultural economics and food security (1). Consequently, enhancing the efficiency of poultry production is vital for enhancing yields, lowering costs, and promoting sustainability. Current strategies to improve the efficiency of poultry production include genetic improvement and nutritional management (2, 3). Among these, the pivotal role of nutritional strategies in maximizing poultry productivity and promoting poultry health has received significant attention, as it addresses the increasing consumer demand for higher quality and safer food products (4, 5).
The intestinal tract of poultry is essential for nutrient digestion, absorption, and defense against pathogens (6). The intestinal health of poultry is closely associated with their growth, as a healthy gut is essential for enabling poultry to fully exploit nutrients in feedstuffs while maintaining normal growth patterns alongside resisting disease invasion (7–9). Therefore, maintaining the intestinal health of poultry is very important to improve the efficiency of poultry production. However, various factors including feed quality, housing environment conditions, and stress can all contribute to microbiota imbalance within the gut, malfunctioning intestinal barriers, and abnormal morphological changes within the intestines of poultry, resulting in adverse effects on their health and growth performance (10–13). Antibiotics have traditionally been used as growth promoters and gut health regulators in poultry. However, in recent years, with increasing emphasis on food safety and environmental protection, the pressing need for alternatives to antibiotics in livestock and poultry farming has emerged due to issues stemming from antibiotic misuse such as antibiotic resistance emergence, drug residues, and environmental pollution (14–16).
Probiotics, beneficial microorganisms, show significant potential in livestock and poultry farming (17–22). Previous studies have demonstrated that probiotics can inhibit bacterial infection, in-crease antioxidant capacity, alleviate toxicity and improve intestinal health in poultry production (23–26). The probiotics used in poultry production mainly include Bacillus (27), Lactobacillus (28), Bifidobacterium (29), and Enterococcus (30). Among these, Bacillus is more advantageous in regulating intestinal health and enhancing the growth performance of poultry as an alternative to antibiotics, due to its ability to produce resistance endospores, which confer heat resistance during feed granulation, low pH resistance in the stomach, and storage stability at ambient temperatures (22, 31, 32). Clostridium butyricum (C. butyricum) is a gram-positive obligate anaerobic bacterium belonging to Bacillus family and Clostridium genus that can produce butyric acid and lactic acid. It has the characteristics of Bacillus that can produce spores, making it resistant to heat, stomach acid, and bile salts, essential for its application in feed production (17, 33). Clostridium butyricum has attracted significant attention as a crucial probiotic due to its role in preserving gut health and enhancing the growth performance of poultry (23, 27, 34–36). This is attributed to the ability of C. butyricum to modulate intestinal flora balance and bolster immune function, while enhances nutrient absorption by producing diverse enzymes and vitamins (23, 36–38), thereby improving the growth performance of poultry. With its distinct biological characteristics and beneficial functions, C. butyricum has emerged as a potential alter-native to antibiotics.
However, Differences in digestion among poultry species, such as chickens, ducks, and geese, may influence the effects and mechanisms of C. butyricum. Therefore, although the application of C. butyricum in poultry production has received extensive attention, it is necessary to review its application effects on different poultry species. In this context, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to conduct indepth research on the effects of C. butyricum on the health of poultry intestines and its role in promoting growth performance. By understanding how C. butyricum works, we can offer more scientific and rational breeding strategies for the poultry sector, reducing reliance on antibiotics, enhancing breeding efficiency, and ensuring the quality and safety of poultry products to meet consumer demand for healthy food. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of how C. butyricum benefits poultry growth performance by regulating intestinal health.
Clostridium butyricum promotes intestinal health of poultry
The intestinal health of poultry is a complex and critical aspect of poultry production. A healthy intestinal system is essential for efficient nutrient digestion and absorption, immune function, and pathogen resistance (39). In actual production, poultry often face a variety of stressors, including heat stress (40), Eimeria spp. infection (41), Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) infection (42), mycotoxins (43), and other harmful effects, which can damage the structure of intestinal mucosa and intestinal barrier function. In recent years, the use of probiotics, such as C. butyricum, has gained attention as a potential strategy to enhance intestinal health and improve the performance of poultry (35–38).
Clostridium butyricum promotes intestinal development
Clostridium butyricum has been shown to have positive effects on the morphology and integrity of the intestinal mucosa in poultry including broiler chickens (38), laying hens (44), ducks (36), and goose (45). It promotes the development of villi, increases the intestinal villus height (VH), decreases the crypt depth (CD), and increases the VH-to-CD ratio (VCR) (38, 45–47). For instance, Liu et al. (36) showed that dietary C. butyricum supplementation significantly increased intestinal VH of Pekin ducks at 42 days. Obianwuna et al. (44) showed that dietary addition of C. butyricum (C. butyricum zlc-17, and C. butyricum lwc-13) significantly increased the VH, villus width, surface area, and VCR, and significantly reduced the CD of laying hens. Yu et al. (45) showed that dietary supplemented with C. butyricum significantly increased duodenal weight and absolute weight (weight/length), and significantly increased ileum VH of geese. Xu et al. (46) showed that C. perfringens destroys intestinal structure and deepens intestinal CD in broilers, while C. butyricum can improve intestinal morphological structure and decrease the CD. These structural improvements enhance the absorptive capacity of the intestine and facilitate better nutrient uptake.
The promoting effect of C. butyricum on intestinal morphology is primarily attributed to its strong capacity for butyric acid production, which serves as a direct energy source for the growth of intestinal villi, plays a pivotal nutritional role in the development of intestinal villi, and facilitates the repair of damaged intestinal epithelial cells (17, 48). Additionally, it is associated with its strong ability to promote the secretion of intestinal digestive enzymes, such as alkaline phosphatase, amylase, protease, trypsin, and lipase (38, 49, 50), which assist in the degradation of starch, fat, protein and anti-nutrient factors, and thus improve the digestion and absorption efficiency of nutrients. Therefore, the addition of C. butyricum to poultry diets can positively impact the development of the intestinal tract in poultry by enhancing intestinal morphology and structure, as well as stimulating the secretion of digestive enzymes. The inclusion of C. butyricum in poultry diets may therefore lead to overall enhancements in poultry health and productivity.
Clostridium butyricum enhances intestinal antioxidant capacity
Oxidative stress is a state of imbalance between the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the body and an inadequate function of the antioxidant defense system (51–53). ROS, such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical, can cause lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage (54). Malonaldehyde (MDA) is the main product of lipid peroxidation, protein carbonyl (PCO) is a marker of oxidative damage of protein, and 8-hydroxy-2 ‘-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is a marker of oxidative damage of nucleic acid, which are generally considered as the markers of oxidative damage (55, 56). To counteract the harmful effects of ROS, cells possess a complex antioxidant defense system. This includes enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), which convert ROS into less reactive species. Non-enzymatic antioxidants like vitamins C and E, glutathione, and carotenoids scavenge ROS and prevent their accumulation (57). The balance between ROS generation and antioxidant defense is critical for maintaining cellular homeostasis.
Clostridium butyricum is a beneficial bacterium that has been shown to exert multiple beneficial effects, including antioxidant function on the intestinal of poultry (45, 50). Studies have demonstrated that supplementation with C. butyricum can reduce the levels of oxidative stress markers in the intestinal tissue of poultry. For example, Xiang et al. (58) demonstrated that feeding a diet containing C. butyricum reduced ROS levels in the ileum (4.12 U/mL vs. 3.57 U/mL) and cecum (3.81 U/mL vs. 3.08 U/mL), and serum MDA levels (16.82 nmol/mL vs. 13.40 nmol/mL) of laying hens. Yu et al. (45) showed that the combination of C. butyricum and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) significantly increased SOD levels in jejunum and T-AOC and GSH-Px levels in ileum of geese. Li et al. (50) demonstrated that supplementation of C. butyricum to broilers led to a significant increase in serum SOD (83.85 U/mL vs. 90.90 U/mL at 21 days; 117.2 U/mL vs. 128.1 U/mL at 42 days) and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC; 0.68 U/mL vs. 0.71 U/mL at 42 days), as well as a notable reduction in MDA levels (4.15 nmol/mL vs. 3.67 nmol/mL at 42 days). Additionally, there was a significant upregulation in the mRNA expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and SOD1 in the jejunum mucosa (50). Nrf2 is a kind of transcription factor that closely related to cellular redox balance, which helps cells remain stable in response to oxidative stress. Under normal conditions, Nrf2 binds with Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) in the cytoplasm, where Keap1 promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of Nrf2 by the proteasome (51). When cells experience oxidative stress, ROS modify cysteine residues on Keap1, causing Nrf2 to dissociate from Keap1. The released Nrf2 then enters the nucleus, forms a heterodimer with small Maf proteins, and binds to the antioxidant response elements (ARE) in the promoter regions of target genes, thereby activating the transcription of downstream antioxidant genes, such as phase II metabolic enzymes (Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and NAD(P)H:Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1)), and antioxidant enzymes (such as SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px) (51, 59). These antioxidant enzymes can eliminate ROS, reduce oxidative damage and maintain the redox balance of cells. It means that C. butyricum alleviates intestinal oxidative damage in poultry by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Clostridium butyricum enhances intestinal mucosal barrier function.
The intestinal mucosal barrier in poultry is a complex and dynamic structure composed of multiple layers and components. The epithelial layer, which consists of enterocytes, goblet cells, and Paneth cells, forms the first line of defense (39). Tight junctions between enterocytes regulate the paracellular passage of substances and maintain the integrity of the physical barrier (22). The mucus layer secreted by goblet cells acts as a chemical barrier and traps pathogens (22). Therefore, the intestinal mucosal barrier, composed of a physical barrier and a chemical barrier, is very important for intestinal health. In production practice, poultry is susceptible to pathogens, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) (38), Salmonella (60), and C. perfringens (46, 61), which can increase intestinal permeability and damage the intestinal mucosal barrier, resulting in significant economic losses in poultry farming. For instance, Zhang et al. (38) demonstrated that broilers exhibited a significant increase in serum endotoxin (0.252 EU/mL vs. 0.380 EU/mL at 21 days) and diamine oxidase (DAO; 0.819 U/mL vs. 3.952 U/mL at 21 days) levels following E. coli infection, indicating heightened intestinal permeability. Xu et al. (46) showed that necrotizing enteritis (NE) caused by C. perfringens infection led to reduced conductivity and short-circuit current values, along with increased fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran flux, indicating heightened intestinal permeability in broilers. Furthermore, C. perfringens significantly downregulated the expression of Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1), Claudin-1, Occluding, and mucin 2 (MUC-2) genes in the small intestine of broilers, indicating that C. perfringens seriously damaged intestinal mucosal barrier function of broilers.
Numerous studies have shown that C. butyricum has a positive regulatory effect on the intestinal mucosal barrier of poultry (38, 46, 60, 61). Clostridium butyricum regulates the intestinal mucosal barrier of poultry mainly through the following ways:
Firstly, C. butyricum reduces intestinal permeability of poultry. Intestinal permeability, defined as the controlled passage of molecules across the intestinal epithelium, is a key determinant of barrier functions (17). An increased intestinal permeability can lead to increased translocation of pathogens and toxins, resulting in inflammation, impaired growth performance, and higher susceptibility to diseases (62). Therefore, understanding the factors that influence intestinal permeability and identifying effective strategies to maintain its integrity are of utmost importance in the poultry industry. Clostridium butyricum is a potential probiotic, and previous studies have provided convincing evidence that C. butyricum has a positive effect on intestinal permeability in poultry. For instance, Zhang et al. (38) demonstrated that the dietary inclusion of C. butyricum led to a notable reduction in endotoxin (0.380 EU/mL vs. 0.0.304 EU/mL at 21 days) and DAO levels (3.952 U/mL vs. 2.419 U/mL at 21 days), suggesting an amelioration of the intestinal mucosal damage caused by E. coli. Xu et al. (46) showed that dietary addition with C. butyricum led to increased conductivity and short-circuit current values, along with a decreased fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran flux in intestinal of broilers infection with C. perfringens, which means that C. butyricum decreased intestinal permeability in broilers. A decrease in intestinal permeability means an enhanced intestinal barrier function, which can more effectively prevent harmful substances (such as bacteria, toxins, and incompletely digested proteins) from entering the bloodstream while promoting the absorption of nutrients, improving feed conversion rates and reducing mortality (63, 64).
Secondly, C. butyricum enhances the expression of intestinal tight junction proteins in poultry. Tight junctions, including ZO-1, Claudin-1, Occluding, are essential components of the intestinal mucosal barrier that protect against harmful pathogens (22). Previous studies have shown that C. butyricum can enhance the expression of intestinal tight junction protein in poultry, so as to maintain the integrity of the physical barrier and ensure its normal function (36, 60, 61, 65–67). For instance, Zhao et al. (60) showed that treatment with C. butyricum significantly upregulated the expression of intestinal ZO-1 gene in Salmonella enteritis-infected broilers (6 days post-infection) and in Chicken intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) after 6 h post-infection with Salmonella enteritis. Li et al. (65) showed that dietary supplemented with C. butyricum (1 × 10^9^ cfu/kg) for 42 days significantly upregulated the expression of claudin-1 and ZO-1 mRNA in ileum of broilers.
Thirdly, C. butyricum stimulates the differentiation of intestinal goblet cells and promote the secretion of intestinal mucins (MUCs) (60, 68). For example, Liu et al. (36) showed that feeding 200 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg C. butyricum for 42 days could significantly increase intestinal MUC2 gene expression in Pekin ducks. Zhao et al. (60) showed that C. butyricum could alleviate intestinal damage of Salmonella enteritis-infected broilers by increasing the expression of MUC-2 mRNA. Xu et al. (68) showed that broilers fed with C. butyricum (1 × 10^9^ cfu/kg) for 28 days significantly increased the number, length and density of goblet cells, as well as upregulated the expression of MUC-2 mRNA in in ileum of broilers.
Clostridium butyricum strengthens intestinal immune function and alleviates intestinal inflammation
The intestinal epithelium serves as not only a mechanical barrier in the intestine but also as one of the most crucial innate immune barriers. It plays a vital role in maintaining intestinal immune function by producing immune-related molecules and participating in the interaction of immune cells (22, 69). Within the intestinal epithelial mucosa, the lamina propria includes Peyer’s patches (PP), immune cells, antimicrobial peptides and secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), which are involved in protecting the host from invasion by foreign pathogens and maintaining the stability of the intestinal environment (22, 69–71). Many factors, such as heat stress (72) and pathogen infection (73), can cause intestinal inflammatory damage in poultry. Inflammatory response has a complex regulatory mechanism, and excessive inflammatory response will cause ir-reversible damage to the body. A large number of studies have confirmed that C. butyricum has an alleviating effect on intestinal inflammatory damage in poultry (38, 50, 65, 74).
When the intestinal mucosal barrier is damaged, Gram-negative bacteria may invade the intestinal mucosa, but the widespread presence of sIgA, an immunoglobulin secreted by the intestinal mucosal plasma cells, can effectively resist its invasion and destruction by interacting with these bacteria, thus playing a role in protecting the intestinal mucosal barrier (75, 76). Clear evidence supports the fact that C. butyricum can enhance the secretion of sIgA in the intestines of various animals, including rabbits (48, 77) and broiler chickens (74, 78). This suggests that one of the mechanisms by which C. butyricum regulates the intestinal immune barrier in poultry is by promoting the secretion of sIgA, which is particularly important in poultry, as intestinal health is directly linked to overall growth performance and disease resistance.
Anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) have been shown to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine production and promote tissue repair and homeostasis (79–81). By enhancing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, C. butyricum plays a crucial role in mitigating excessive inflammatory responses within the intestinal tract (46). This modulation helps maintain a balanced immune environment, which is essential for the overall health and productivity of poultry. For instance, Xu et al. (46) showed that infection with C. perfringens significantly induced intestinal inflammatory response in broilers, and dietary supplementation with C. butyricum alleviated intestinal inflammatory damage by promoting the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors IL-10 and TGF-β. Similarly, Huang et al. (61) showed that C. butyricum promoted intestinal IL-10 secretion in broilers with necrotizing enteritis caused by C. perfringens. At the same time, C. butyricum also had inhibitory effect on proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in poultry intestines (60, 82). For instance, Zhao et al. (60) and Zhang et al. (83) showed that C. butyricum significantly inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, interferon (IFN-γ) and TNF-α, thus alleviating the intestinal inflammatory damage caused by Salmonella in broilers. Similarly, Li et al. (65) showed that C. butyricum significantly decreased the expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) to mitigate high stocking density-induced intestinal inflammatory damage in broilers. Although the immunomodulatory mechanisms of C. butyricum are general, their effects may be species-specific. That’s because the composition of the intestinal microbiota varies among different poultry breeds, due to the differences in genetic background, physiological characteristics and rearing methods (84), which can affect the colonization of exogenous microorganisms (such as C. butyricum) in the intestinal tract. For example, a certain type of C. butyricum may be more easily established in specific poultry breeds, producing more butyrate and thus exerting stronger immune-modulatory effects (85).
Studies have shown that C. butyricum can interact with related inflammatory signaling pathways to mitigate inflammatory pathological damage of poultry. For example, C. butyricum can inhibit toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway, thus playing a protective role in Salmonella-induced intestinal inflammation of broilers (60, 86). Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway induces the secretion of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α and IFN-γ and aggravates inflammation (87, 88). However, by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway, C. butyricum can reduce the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α), thereby reducing the inflammatory response of poultry (38, 60, 65, 86). For instance, Li et al. (50) showed that C. butyricum alleviated intestinal inflammatory response in broilers by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB, which was manifested as decreased expression of TNF-α and increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Zhao et al. (60, 86) showed that C. butyricum decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory factors (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α) by inhibiting the TLR4-myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-NF-κB pathway, thereby alleviating the intestinal inflammatory response of broilers caused by Salmonella infection. In summary, C. butyricum can reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8), and promote the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors (IL-10 and TGF-β1) and immunoglobulin (sIgA) by inhibiting the TLR4-MyD88-NF-κb pathway, thereby reducing intestinal inflammation in poultry.
Clostridium butyricum regulates intestinal microbial balance
The intestinal microbiota of poultry is a complex ecosystem that consists of a diverse array of microorganisms, along with their metabolites, which form the intestinal microbial barrier (17). The intestinal microbiota of poultry is predominantly composed of Firmicutes, Bacteroides and Proteobacteria, which primarily inhabit the intestinal mucosa surface and play a pivotal role in intestinal nutrient metabolism, permeability, and immunity (89, 90). Under normal physiological conditions, the probiotics and pathogenic bacteria in the intestinal environment of poultry are in a dynamic balance state, but this balance is easily affected by exogenous and endogenous factors (91, 92), which would lead to a variety of diseases and cause great economic damage to poultry production. Thus, the maintenance of intestinal microbial dynamic balance is of great significance for promoting healthy poultry breeding.
Clostridium butyricum have significant effect in regulating the intestinal flora of poultry. It can stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria (such as Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium) inherent in the intestinal tract of poultry, and inhibit the reproduction of harmful bacteria (Such as Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, C. perfringens) (37, 93–95), thereby reducing dysentery in poultry. The probiotic effect of C. butyricum on poultry is attributed to its strong ability to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), particularly butyric acid, which can reduce intestinal pH and inhibits the growth of harmful bacteria thereby improving the structure of intestinal flora (36, 47, 49, 96–98). Additionally, butyric acid can stimulate the expression of the AVBD-9 gene in macrophages, bone marrow cells, and monocytes of poultry, and enhance the expression of host defense peptide genes such as AVBD-9, AVBD-10, AVBD-14, and Cath B1 in poultry gut, effectively suppressing the invasion of foreign microorganisms (99, 100). Furthermore, C. butyricum itself, as a probiotic, can compete with pathogenic microorganisms for adhesion sites, thereby inhibiting their adhesion and colonization in the gut (17, 101). For instance, Yang et al. (37) showed that dietary supplementation with 2 × 10^7^ CFU/kg or 3 × 10^7^ CFU/kg of C. butyricum significantly reduced the number of harmful bacteria (E. coli, Salmonella and C. perfringen) and increased the number of beneficial bacteria (C. butyricum, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) in ileum of broilers.
Clostridium butyricum can also improve intestinal microbial diversity, regulate intestinal microbial structure, and maintain intestinal microbial dynamic balance. For instance, previous studies have demonstrated that dietary supplementation of C. butyricum significantly influenced the intestinal microbial α-diversity, as evidenced by a significant increase in the ACE index, Chao 1 index and Shannon index (36, 45, 65). At the phylum level, C. butyricum supplementation could increase the proportion of Firmicutes and decrease the proportion of Proteobacteria in the intestinal tract of poultry (68, 82,). At the genus level, C. butyricum supplementation could increase the proportion of some beneficial bacteria, such as Bacteroides (65, 96), Butyricicoccus (68), Lactobacillus (45, 68) and Barnesiella (102), while reduce the proportion of some harmful bacteria, such as Ralstonia (45), Escherichia-Shigella (96) and Klebsiella (96, 103) in the intestinal tract of poultry. In conclusion, C. butyricum can enhance the diversity of intestinal microbiota in poultry, optimize the composition and structure of intestinal microbiota, thereby maintaining a dynamic balance and promoting a healthy intestinal environment in poultry.
Clostridium butyricum promotes production performance of poultry
Intestinal health is very important for poultry growth and development. Optimal intestinal morphology and structure can facilitate the secretion of digestive enzymes, thereby enhancing the efficiency of nutrient digestion and absorption (38). A well-functioning intestinal barrier is essential for protecting poultry from various antigenic substances and ensuring their overall health and growth (104). Poultry is susceptible to heat stress (105), mycotoxin toxicity (106), and infections from pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella (107), E. coli (108), and C. perfringens (109), which typically result in decreased feed intake and feed utilization efficiency, leading to a decline in overall production performance, thereby causing significant economic losses in the poultry industry. Many studies have shown that C. butyricum has a promoting effect on poultry production performance, including improving growth performance and product quality (Table 1).
From the summary table, it is evident that dietary addition of C. butyricum has a positive feeding effect on broiler chickens, laying hens, ducks and geese. In broilers, C. butyricum has been shown to increase average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI), improve feed conversion efficiency (decreased FCR or F/G), and improve meat quality and meat nutrient composition (35, 37, 38, 46, 49, 50, 65, 68, 74, 93, 97, 110–117). Similarly, for laying hens, C. butyricum has been found to improve laying rate, egg mass, average egg weight, and egg quality, while reducing the feed to egg ratio (34, 44, 58, 82, 95, 118–121). In the case of ducks, C. butyricum can increase ADG, decrease F/G, and improve meat quality (36, 122), but some studies believe that it has no effect on the production performance of ducks (96, 123). Although C. butyricum is less commonly used in goose production, limited studies suggest that it can increased the ADG of geese without affecting FCR (45). From this summary table, we can see that results for ducks and geese are less consistent than those for broilers or layers. This might be related to the fact that the digestive structure of ducks and geese is different from that of broilers and laying hens. Of course, the most important thing is that C. butyricum is used too little in ducks and geese. The limited data has a very significant impact on the accuracy of the conclusion, which requires further extensive research in the future with sufficient data support.
The promotion of poultry production performance by C. butyricum may be related to the following reasons: (i) it ferments and degrades undigested dietary fiber in the intestine to produce SCFAs, such as butyric acid (96–98), which directly supplies energy to intestinal epithelial cells, promotes intestinal villi growth, and enhances the digestion, absorption, and utilization of dietary nutrients in poultry, thus improving production performance. (ii) It stimulates the secretion of intestinal digestive enzymes (amylase, protease, lipase, and protease) (38, 49, 50) to break down macromolecular substances like carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids in the feed, thereby enhancing nutrient digestibility and improving feed conversion efficiency. (iii) It helps establish a healthy intestinal barrier for poultry (48, 60, 67, 100), which can effectively prevent the invasion of pathogenic substances and maintain the overall health of poultry, thereby improving the production performance of poultry.
Except for the addition of C. butyricum alone, the combined use of C. butyricum with other probiotics or functional substances has a synergistic promoting effect on the growth performance of poultry (47, 124). For instance, Zeng et al. (47) showed that dietary supplemented with a complex probiotic composed of C. butyricum, B. subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis (B. licheniformis) can improve the overall health status of broilers, enhance their growth performance and immunity, and regulate the microbial community structure of the cecum. Zhang et al. (124) showed that dietary supplemented with a complex probiotic composed of C. butyricum and B. subtilis can effectively improve the growth performance and meat quality of broilers and regulate the microbial community structure in their excreta, which is of great significance to the poultry industry. However, it should be noted that the combined effect of probiotics may be influenced by multiple factors, including the type and dosage of probiotics, the breed of poultry, and the breeding environment. For instance, Yıldırım et al. (125) investigated the combined effects of tryptophan and probiotics on the growth and behavioral parameters of quail, it showed that supplementation with high-concentration tryptophan significantly reduced the weight gain of quails within 27 days, while probiotics had no obvious effect on this. Therefore, the combination of probiotics needs to be comprehensively considered in practical applications, and C. butyricum is no exception.
Conclusion
In conclusion, C. butyricum serves as an effective regulator of intestinal health and exhibits a prebiotic effect on the growth of poultry. Dietary addition of C. butyricum promotes intestinal development, reduces oxidative damage, maintains intestinal barrier function, enhances intestinal nutrient digestion and absorption, improves feed efficiency, and ultimately enhances poultry production performance (e.g., increase weight gain and feed intake, increase egg production rate, and improve the quality of muscle and eggs). However, further research is still needed to fully elucidate the complex interactions and precise molecular mechanisms underlying its beneficial effects. Understanding these mechanisms in detail will not only provide valuable insights for optimizing poultry production but also contribute to the development of more effective and sustainable strategies in the poultry industry.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Connolly G Campbell WW. Poultry consumption and human Cardiometabolic health-related outcomes: a narrative review. Nutrients. (2023) 15:3550. doi: 10.3390/nu 15163550, PMID: 37630747 PMC 10459134 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Saeed M Yan M Ni Z Hussain N Chen H. Molecular strategies to enhance the keratinase gene expression and its potential implications in poultry feed industry. Poult Sci. (2024) 103:103606. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103606, PMID: 38479096 PMC 10951097 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tang X Liu X Liu H. Effects of dietary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation on carcass traits, meat quality, amino acid, and fatty acid profile of broiler chickens. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:767802. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.767802, PMID: 34881321 PMC 8645685 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Shastak Y Pelletier W. From metabolism to vitality: uncovering Riboflavin’s importance in poultry nutrition. Animals. (2023) 13:3554. doi: 10.3390/ani 13223554, PMID: 38003171 PMC 10668813 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Yuan H Bai G Lin Y Yu X Yang Q Dou R. Effects of dietary Nisin on growth performance, immune function, and gut health of broilers challenged by Clostridium perfringens. J Anim Sci. (2024) 102:skae 017. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae 017, PMID: 38266070 PMC 11254313 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6de Oliveira M Pda Silva Pires PG Benetti Filho V Lima ALF Kindlein L Taschetto D. Intestinal health of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. using functional oil blends in two physical forms with or without anticoccidials. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:14612. doi: 10.1038/s 41598-023-41743-9, PMID: 37670021 PMC 10480430 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Saeed M Afzal Z Afzal F Khan RU Elnesr SS Alagawany M. Use of Postbiotic as growth promoter in poultry industry: a review of current knowledge and future prospects. Food Sci Anim Resour. (2023) 43:1111–27. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e 52, PMID: 37969321 PMC 10636223 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Cao J Guo Y Luo X Ge C Hu Z Wu L. Interactions between enzyme preparations and trace element sources on growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. (2023) 102:103124. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103124, PMID: 37922857 PMC 10651683 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
