This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
Retraction: Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards enhanced recovery after surgery among patients underwent thoracoscopy surgery
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery
The PLOS One Editors retract this article [1] because it was identified as one of a series of submissions for which we have concerns about potential manipulation of the publication process. These concerns call into question the validity and provenance of the reported results. We regret that the issues were not identified prior to the article’s publication.
YH did not agree with the retraction XW, JL, QH, and RW either did not respond directly or could not be reached.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.