# Antigenic Characterization of H1N1 Influenza Viruses That Circulated During the 2019–2020 Season in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

**Authors:** Lydia M. Mendoza, Elizabeth M. Anderson, Ashley Sobel Leonard, Alexander G. McFarland, Jordan T. Ort, Nicole Tanenbaum, Afeesat Durosinmi, Frederic D. Bushman, Laurel J. Glaser, Irving Nachamkin, Scott E. Hensley

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/irv.70104 · Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses · 2025-06-01

## TL;DR

The study found that most people infected with H1N1 influenza during 2019–2020 had antibodies that poorly reacted to circulating strains, suggesting vaccine mismatch.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the antigenic mismatch between circulating H1N1 strains and the vaccine component during the 2019–2020 season.

## Key findings

- Most H1N1-infected individuals were infected with clade 6B.1A.5a.1 and 6B.1A.5a.2 viruses with antigenic substitutions.
- Antibodies from H1N1 and IBV-infected individuals recognized the vaccine strain more efficiently than circulating H1N1 strains.
- Patients infected with 6B.1A.5a.2 clade H1N1 had higher titers against the vaccine strain, indicating immune evasion.

## Abstract

Multiple clades of H1N1 influenza A viruses (IAVs) circulated during the 2019–2020 season. Here, we completed serological assays to determine the specificities of serum antibodies from humans infected with viruses from different H1N1 clades during the 2019–2020 season.

We collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and serum from influenza‐infected individuals who received care within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). We sequenced H1N1 viruses from NP swabs and completed hemagglutination inhibition assays using serum and viruses from different H1N1 clades that we identified from NP swabs. We also collected serum samples from influenza B virus (IBV)–infected patients at UPHS, allowing us to examine antibody titers associated with H1N1 versus IBV infection.

Sequence analyses revealed that most IAV‐infected individuals were infected with clade 6B.1A.5a.1 and 6B.1A.5a.2 H1N1 viruses that possessed substitutions at major antigenic sites of hemagglutinin. We found that antibodies from both H1N1‐ and IBV‐infected individuals recognized the 6B.1A.1 H1N1 vaccine component of the 2019–2020 vaccine more efficiently compared to the circulating 6B.1A.5a.1 and 6B.1A.5a.2 H1N1 viruses. Patients infected with 6B.1A.5a.2 clade H1N1 viruses had significantly higher titers against the vaccine strain virus, suggesting that the 6B.1A.5a.2 virus evaded antibodies elicited from previous vaccinations or infections.

These studies suggest that most individuals, irrespective of whether they were infected with H1N1 virus or IBV during the 2019–2020 season, possessed antibodies that poorly reacted to circulating H1N1 strains.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** influenza (MONDO:0005812)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** influenza-infected (MESH:D007251)
- **Species:** H1N1 subtype (serotype) [taxon 114727], Influenza B virus (no rank) [taxon 11520], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127215/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127215/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127215/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127215