# Pterygoid Anchorage of Subperiosteal Implants: An Overview and Case Report

**Authors:** Antoine Diss, Augustin Lerebours, Cyrille Grébonval, Laurine Birault

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.85175 · Cureus · 2025-06-01

## TL;DR

This paper presents a case report on using pterygoid anchorage in subperiosteal implants to treat severe maxillary bone loss without bone grafting.

## Contribution

The study introduces pterygoid anchorage as a novel method to enhance subperiosteal implant stability in patients with extreme bone atrophy.

## Key findings

- Pterygoid anchorage improved implant stability in a patient with severe maxillary atrophy.
- Digital design and additive manufacturing enabled graftless implant placement.
- Immediate loading with a provisional bridge showed good postoperative results.

## Abstract

Severely atrophic maxillae (Cawood and Howell Class V-VI) often prevent conventional implant placement in the absence of extensive bone grafting, which carries risks, especially in elderly patients. Modern subperiosteal implants, digitally designed and manufactured in titanium using additive technologies, offer a graftless solution by anchoring the implant to basal bone structures such as the canine pillars and the zygomatic buttress.

This case report explores the clinical feasibility of adding pterygoid anchorage to increase subperiosteal implant stability. A 71-year-old edentulous female with extreme maxillary atrophy received two custom subperiosteal implants designed with fixation points in the canine, zygomatic, and pterygoid regions. The digital workflow included cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, digital smile design, and implant modeling with a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS)-gyroid structure to promote osseointegration. The implants were manufactured using Direct Metal Laser Sintering in Ti-6Al-4V ELI titanium and loaded immediately with a provisional titanium-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bridge.

Surgical placement included the insertion of bicortical pterygoid screws that penetrated the pterygomaxillary suture, so increasing posterior support and countering the occlusal forces associated with anterior cantilevers. Postoperative results showed excellent implant stability and patient satisfaction.

This report confirms that pterygoid anchorage is a viable addition to subperiosteal implant design. It offers improved mechanical stability and expands treatment options for patients with extreme bone loss, without requiring bone grafting. Further biomechanical and long-term studies are recommended to validate these promising findings.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Pterygoid (MESH:D000080902), atrophic maxillae (MESH:D002485), bone loss (MESH:D001847), Class V-VI (MESH:D008311), atrophy (MESH:D001284)
- **Chemicals:** Ti-6Al-4V ELI titanium (-), titanium (MESH:D014025), PMMA (MESH:D019904)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127016/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127016/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127016/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12127016