[Corrigendum] New application of an old drug: Antitumor activity and mechanisms of doxycycline in small cell lung cancer
Sheng-Qi Wang, Bo-Xin Zhao, Yuan Liu, Ya-Tian Wang, Qian-Ying Liang, Yun Cai, Yun-Qi Zhang, Jiang-Hong Yang, Zhi-Hua Song, Guo-Feng Li
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLung Cancer Research Studies · Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis · Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Int J Oncol 48: 1353-1360, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3375
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, in Fig. 3 on p. 1356 showing the results of cellular apoptosis experiments, the 'Doxy 5 µg/ml' and 'Doxy 10 µg/ml' data panels appeared to contain overlapping data, such that these images were apparently derived from the same original source where the results of differently performed experiments were intended to have been shown. In addition, in Fig. 4A on p. 1357, showing the results of TUNEL assay experiments, the 'Doxy 10 µg/ml' and '5-FU 25 µg/ml' data panels contained overlapping sections, similarly suggesting that these data had been derived from the same original source.
The authors were able to consult their original data, and recognized how these errors occurred. The corrected versions of Figs. 3 and 4, now showing the correct data for the 'Doxy 5 µg/ ml' experiment in Fig. 3 and the '5-FU 25 µg/ml' experiment in Fig. 4A, are shown below and on the next page. The authors regret the errors that were made during the compilation of the original figures, and are grateful to the editor of International Journal of Oncology for allowing them the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum. Note that the errors that were made in compiling this pair of figures did not have a significant impact on the conclusions reached in this study. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum; furthermore, they apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused.