# Bone filler and adhesive at the same time: in-vitro analysis in a porcine fracture model

**Authors:** Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht, Nicola Zufall, Maximilian Heilig, Philipp Heilig, Martin Cornelius Jordan, Rainer Heribert Meffert, Uwe Gbureck, Lea Hüls

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08773-y · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2025-05-27

## TL;DR

A new magnesium phosphate cement acts as both a bone adhesive and filler, showing promising biomechanical stability in a porcine fracture model.

## Contribution

Introduces a novel surgical technique using a drillable and adhesive magnesium phosphate cement for fracture reduction and stabilization.

## Key findings

- The new cement technique showed comparable or slightly better biomechanical stability compared to standard methods.
- Group A had the lowest displacement values during cyclic testing.
- Normalized maximum load showed no significant differences between the three groups.

## Abstract

Bone defects in the context of fracture treatment or tumor surgery represent a major challenge regarding their treatment. Sticky and drillable magnesium phosphate cements could revolutionize the intraoperative reconstruction of complex fractures close to the joint due to their properties as bone adhesive and filler at the same time, enabling the technique of first reduction of the fracture fragments by bonding with the cement and then applying stabilization with screws and/or plates.

Lateral split-depression fractures of the proximal tibia were generated in 27 porcine specimens, which were then randomized into 3 groups of 9 each. In group A, a new operative technique was applied by reducing the fracture using a newly formulated magnesium phosphate cement (MgP cement) and then applying stabilization by plate osteosynthesis. In the other two groups, plate osteosynthesis was performed first, as in the current standard operative procedure, followed by the injection of a bone graft substitute through a gap in the fracture area of the tibia, group B with MgP cement, group C with hydroxyapatite cement. The following parameters were determined during the cyclic testing phase of 3000 test cycles: The total displacement and the optical displacement of the lateral plateau [mm]. During load-to-failure tests, the stiffness [N/mm], the maximum load [N] and the normalized maximum load [%] were determined.

The results revealed a comparable stability for all groups with no significant differences in all forms of displacement, with group A demonstrating the lowest values for displacement. Maximum load was highest for group C (group B; C [p = 0.04]; group A; C [p < 0.01]), however considering normalized maximum load, no significant difference between the three groups could be found.

This study presents a breakthrough approach using a bone cement as both a bone adhesive and a filler at the same time. The adhesive and drillable magnesium phosphate cement proved to be a versatile solution featuring a new surgical method in which the fracture was anatomically reduced using only the cement. Furthermore, with this new technique, the cement demonstrated comparable, if not slightly superior, biomechanical stability in the porcine tibial split depression fracture model compared to the current standard of surgical treatment using primary plate osteosynthesis and a commercial hydroxyapatite cement.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Sus scrofa (taxon 9823)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tibial split depression fracture (MESH:D013978), Bone defects (MESH:D001847), depression fractures (MESH:D020204), tumor (MESH:D009369), fracture (MESH:D050723)
- **Chemicals:** magnesium phosphate (MESH:C030781), hydroxyapatite (MESH:D017886)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12117862/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12117862/full.md

## References

8 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12117862/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12117862