# The effect of the administration form of antibiotic therapy on the gut microbiome in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers - DFIATIM trial

## TL;DR

This study examines how different antibiotic administration methods affect gut microbiome diversity in patients with diabetic foot infections.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific bacterial markers and metabolic pathways influenced by bolus versus continuous antibiotic administration in diabetic foot infection patients.

## Key findings

- Alpha and beta diversity of gut microbiota showed no significant difference between bolus and continuous antibiotic administration.
- Enterococcus, Sellimonas, and Lachnoclostridium were more abundant in antibiotic-treated patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers.
- Bolus administration upregulated pathways like 'Transporters' and 'ABC transporters', potentially increasing intestinal barrier permeability.

## Abstract

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) contribute to the global disability burden. Beta-lactams are the most commonly used antibiotics for treating DFIs. However, the use of antibiotics may lead to disruption of the healthy balance of the gut microbiota, causing dysbiosis.

Patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers (iDFUs) were treated with two kinds of beta-lactams (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ceftazidime) according to microbial sensitivity of causative agents via bolus or continuous administration modes. Changes in the gut microbiome of patients were analyzed. Diabetic patients without iDFUs were used as a control group. 16 S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on stool samples collected from participants.

Alpha diversity and beta diversity of gut microbiota of treated patients did not show significant differences between bolus and continuous modes. However, significant differences were observed between gut microbiota diversity of treated patients and control group. PCoA plots showed individualized responses of the patient’s gut microbiota to antibiotics at different times using both administration forms associated with the pre-treatment state of microbiota composition. Enterococcus, Sellimonas, and Lachnoclostridium were the common bacterial markers differentially abundant in the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated patients with iDFUs while Roseburia, Dorea, and Monoglobus were mainly abundant in the gut microbiota of patients without iDFUs. Predicted pathways like “Transporters”, “ABC transporters” and “Phosphotranspherase system (PTS)” were upregulated in the gut microbiome of patients treated with bolus regime which may lead to increased intestinal barrier permeability.

The present study reported alterations in gut microbiota composition and functionality and provided the bacterial markers as well as potential metabolic signatures associated with each administration mode in patients with iDFUs, which may be used as a reference set for future studies of the effect of antibiotics administration on the gut microbiome of patients with iDFUs. This study shed light on the importance of understanding the effect of antibiotic administration form on gut microbiome in patients with iDFUs.

The DFIATIM Clinical Trial (Full title: “Rationalisation of ATB therapy in diabetic foot infection and its impact on the intestinal microbiota”) is submitted to the European Union Clinical Trials Database under the EudraCT Number: 2019-001997-27. The date of registration is July 17th, 2020.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-025-04041-0.