# Guinea Pigs Are Not a Suitable Model to Study Neurological Impacts of Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Intranasal Infection

## TL;DR

Guinea pigs are not suitable for studying SARS-CoV-2 neurological effects due to lack of susceptibility to intranasal infection.

## Contribution

Demonstrates experimentally that guinea pigs are unsuitable for modeling SARS-CoV-2 neurological impacts.

## Key findings

- Guinea pigs are not susceptible to intranasal infection with ancestral SARS-CoV-2.
- No viral RNA, protein, or infectious virus was detected in PNS or CNS tissues.
- Suggests guinea pigs are not useful for studying neurological impacts of SARS-CoV-2.

## Abstract

Neurological symptoms involving the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) are common complications of acute COVID-19 as well as post-COVID conditions. Most research into these neurological sequalae focuses on the CNS, disregarding the PNS. Guinea pigs were previously shown to be useful models of disease during the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic. However, their suitability for studying SARS-CoV-2 has not been experimentally demonstrated. To assess the suitability of guinea pigs as models for SARS-CoV-2 infection and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the PNS, and to determine routes of CNS invasion through the PNS, we intranasally infected wild-type Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020. We assessed PNS sensory neurons (trigeminal ganglia, dorsal root ganglia), autonomic neurons (superior cervical ganglia), brain regions (olfactory bulb, brainstem, cerebellum, cortex, hippocampus), lungs, and blood for viral RNA (RT-qPCR), protein (immunostaining), and infectious virus (plaque assay) at three- and six-days post infection. We show that guinea pigs, which have previously been used as a model of SARS-CoV-1 pulmonary disease, are not susceptible to intranasal infection with ancestral SARS-CoV-2, and are not useful models in assessing neurological impacts of infection with SARS-CoV-2 isolates from the early pandemic.