Comparative Evaluation of Automatic Detection and Classification of Daily Living Activities Using Batch Learning and Stream Learning Algorithms

TL;DR

This paper compares batch and stream learning algorithms for automatically detecting and classifying daily living activities using sensor data, aiming to improve health monitoring and elderly care.

Contribution

The study introduces a comprehensive evaluation of real-time ADL classification using both batch and stream learning algorithms with integrated sensor data.

Findings

A dataset with 238,990 samples and 56 activities was created by integrating 23 ADL datasets.

Stream learning algorithms showed dynamic adaptation to data changes, improving real-time classification.

A mobile application was developed to classify ADLs in real time using the dataset.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are crucial for assessing an individual’s autonomy, encompassing tasks such as eating, dressing, and moving around, among others. Predicting these activities is part of health monitoring, elderly care, and intelligent systems, improving quality of life, and facilitating early dependency detection, all of which are relevant components of personalized health and social care. However, the automatic classification of ADLs from sensor data remains challenging due to high variability in human behavior, sensor noise, and discrepancies in data acquisition protocols. These challenges limit the accuracy and applicability of existing solutions. This study details the modeling and evaluation of real-time ADL classification models based on batch learning (BL) and stream learning (SL) algorithms. Methods: The methodology followed is the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). The models were trained with a comprehensive dataset integrating 23 ADL-centric datasets using accelerometers and gyroscopes data. The data were preprocessed by applying normalization and sampling rate unification techniques, and finally, relevant sensor locations on the body were selected. Results: After cleaning and debugging, a final dataset was generated, containing 238,990 samples, 56 activities, and 52 columns. The study compared models trained with BL and SL algorithms, evaluating their performance under various classification scenarios using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and F1-score metrics. Finally, a mobile application was developed to classify ADLs in real time (feeding data from a dataset). Conclusions: The outcome of this study can be used in various data science projects related to ADL and Human activity recognition (HAR), and due to the integration of diverse data sources, it is potentially useful to address bias and improve generalizability in Machine Learning models. The principal advantage of online learning algorithms is dynamically adapting to data changes, representing a significant advance in personal autonomy and health care monitoring.

Figures