Comparative Study of Stress–Strain Behavior and Microstructure of Three Solid-Waste-Powder-Modified Lateritic Clays

TL;DR

This study compares how adding industrial waste powders improves the strength and structure of clay in southern China, helping with engineering applications during wet seasons.

Contribution

The study provides a comparative analysis of three solid-waste powders in modifying lateritic clay, revealing their dosage effects and deformation mechanisms.

Findings

Steel slag increased clay strength by 397% at 7% dosage after 7 days.

Fly ash and blast furnace slag improved strength by about 185% at 5% dosage.

SEM analysis showed more hydration products correlate with higher strength and elastic deformation.

Abstract

Lateritic clay is widely distributed in southern China, and its strength is greatly affected by water content. The elevated moisture content in lateritic clay during monsoon periods frequently results in insufficient shear strength for standard engineering applications. Large quantities of solid waste, including steel slag, fly ash, and granulated blast furnace slag, are produced as industrial by-products. This paper is based on the backfilling resource utilization of steel slag, fly ash, and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag as lateritic clay improvement admixtures, along with the stress–strain behavior, strength characteristics, and microstructure of steel-slag-modified lateritic clay, fly-ash-modified lateritic clay, and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag-modified lateritic clay, by combining uniaxial compression tests, straight shear tests, and scanning electron microscopy observation. The experimental results were analyzed to determine the appropriate dosages of three kinds of solid waste and their mechanisms in lateritic clay modification. The results indicate that the unconfined compressive strength of SS-modified lateritic clay exhibited an increase with an increase in SS dosage in the range of 1–7%, the unconfined compressive strength of FA-modified lateritic clay showed an increase with an increase in FA dosage in the range of 1–5%, and the unconfined compressive strength of GGBFS-modified lateritic clay increased with an increase in the use of GGBFS in the range of 1–5%. Under the condition of a 7-day curing age, the unconfined compressive strength of lateritic clay modified with 7% SS increased by approximately 397%, while that modified with 5% FA and 5% GGBFS exhibited increases of about 187% and 185%, respectively. The stress–strain relationship of fly-ash and blast-furnace slag-modified lateritic clays showed elastic–plastic deformation. But the stress–strain behavior of steel-slag-modified lateritic clay at a steel slag dose greater than 5% and a maintenance age greater than 7 days showed elastic deformation. Analyzing the SEM images shows that the more hydration products are generated, the relatively higher the unconfined compressive strength of modified lateritic clay is, and the form of deformation of modified lateritic clay is closer to elastic deformation. Through comparative analysis of modified lateritic clay samples, this study elucidates the property-altering mechanisms of waste powder additives, guiding their engineering utilization.

Figures