# Evidence for the Necessity of Objective Hearing Tests in Cochlear Implantation Assessment: Excluding Functional Hearing Loss Cases

## TL;DR

This study shows that objective hearing tests are essential to avoid misdiagnosing functional hearing loss in patients being considered for cochlear implants.

## Contribution

The study emphasizes the necessity of integrating objective hearing tests like ABR and ASSR in cochlear implantation assessments to prevent misdiagnosis of functional hearing loss.

## Key findings

- 11 patients diagnosed with functional hearing loss were identified among those referred for cochlear implantation evaluation.
- Objective tests revealed that only four cases had no organic cause, while seven had ear abnormalities insufficient to explain reported hearing loss.
- The study advocates for mandatory use of ABR and ASSR in cochlear implant candidate evaluations to ensure accurate diagnosis.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation is a crucial intervention for individuals with severe hearing loss, aiming to restore auditory function and improve quality of life. The decision to recommend cochlear implantation critically depends on accurate audiological evaluations. However, challenges arise when subjective assessments of hearing loss do not align with objective audiological measurements, leading to potential misdiagnoses. Comparisons are to be made between subjective and objective results, with an investigation into the characteristics, warning signs, and risk factors of functional hearing loss (FHL). Methods: A retrospective study of hearing loss presentations at an otorhinolaryngological university clinic between 2020 and 2024 was performed, whereby we collected FHL cases. The evaluation process included measurements of subjectively perceived hearing loss through pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding, and communication testing. The objective assessments comprised impedance measurement, otoacoustic emission measurement, auditory brainstem responses, auditory steady-state responses, and medical imaging. Results: During the studied period, 11 patients, with an average age of 35.2 years (13 to 64 years), who were originally referred for cochlear implantation evaluation and subsequently diagnosed with FHL, were identified. The majority (10 patients) were female. No organic cause was identified in four cases, while seven cases exhibited some organic ear abnormalities insufficient to justify the reported hearing loss. The degree of FHL ranged from 30 dB to 90 dB, with an average of 60 dB. Conclusions: Diagnosing FHL is challenging and requires comprehensive assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. Failure to recognize it may lead to inappropriate treatment, including unnecessary cochlear implantation. This study advocates for the mandatory integration of ABR and ASSR in the clinical evaluation of all cochlear implant candidates to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.