# The Effect of Fungal Nutraceutical Supplementation on Postoperative Complications, Inflammatory Factors and Fecal Microbiota in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery with Curative Intent: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

**Authors:** Cristina Regueiro, Astrid Irene Diez Martín, Sonia Pérez, Carlos Daviña-Núñez, Sara Zarraquiños, David Remedios, Cristina Alejandra Sánchez Gómez, Sara Alonso Lorenzo, Romina Fernández Poceiro, María Luisa de Castro Parga, Vicent Hernández Ramírez, Arturo Rodríguez-Blanco, Esteban Sinde, Catalina Fernández-de-Ana, Joaquín Cubiella

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13051185 · Biomedicines · 2025-05-13

## TL;DR

This clinical trial tested if a fungal supplement called Micodigest 2.0 helps reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery by improving gut health and inflammation.

## Contribution

The study is the first to evaluate the impact of a fungal nutraceutical on postoperative outcomes and gut microbiota in colorectal cancer patients.

## Key findings

- Micodigest 2.0 showed non-significant reductions in postoperative complications.
- The supplement significantly altered gut microbiota, reducing Firmicutes and Actinobacteria.
- It also improved immune markers like lymphocyte levels and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The combination of different fungal extracts could be beneficial to cancer patients due to their role in gut microbiota modulation and anti-inflammatory activity. The study aimed to evaluate whether fungal extract supplementation reduces postsurgical complications in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive the nutraceutical Micodigest 2.0 or a placebo until surgery. Surgical complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We also assessed the effect of the nutraceutical on gut microbiota composition, inflammatory response, nutritional status, and quality of life. A subanalysis based on surgery type (robotic vs. non-robotic) was performed. Results: We included 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with 27 randomized to the intervention group and 19 to the placebo group, receiving treatment for three (2–4) weeks. Non-robotic surgery was performed in 35 (76.1%) patients. We found non-significant differences in postoperative complications (Micodigest 2.0: 25.9%, placebo: 26.3%; p = 0.9). In non-robotic surgery, we identified a non-significant reduction in postoperative complications (Micodigest 2.0: 25.0%, placebo: 36.4%; p = 0.7), as well as a significant increase in lymphocyte levels and a reduction in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.02). Micodigest 2.0 supplementation was also associated with significant changes in gut microbiota composition, as indicated by a decreased relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes (p = 0.004) and Actinobacteria (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Micodigest 2.0 supplementation was associated with non-significant reductions in postoperative complications and significant modifications in gut microbiota composition. Limitations: The trial did not reach the calculated sample size.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** colorectal cancer (MONDO:0005575)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Inflammatory (MESH:D007249), Colorectal Cancer (MESH:D015179), cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Chemicals:** Micodigest 2.0 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12108607/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12108607/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12108607/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12108607