Efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Enterococcus faecium DSM 33761, Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 33758, Bifidobacterium animalis DSM 16284, Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 33751, Ligilactobacillus salivarius DSM 16351 (Biomin® C5) as a zootechnical additive for poultry for fattening and reared for laying/breeding (Biomin GmbH)
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a feed additive containing specific bacteria for improving poultry health and growth.
Contribution
The study concludes that Biomin® C5 is effective for poultry when used in feed or water.
Findings
Biomin® C5 is effective when added to feed or water for chickens for fattening.
The efficacy conclusion was extrapolated to other poultry species for fattening and breeding.
Three long-term trials supported the efficacy assessment.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the efficacy of Biomin® C5, which consists of a preparation containing viable cells of Enterococcus faecium DSM 33761, Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 33758, Bifidobacterium animalis DSM 16284, Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 33751 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius DSM 16351, as a zootechnical feed additive (functional group: gut flora stabilisers). The additive is intended to be used for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding and minor poultry species for fattening or reared for laying/breeding at a use level of 1 × 108 CFU/kg complete feed or 5 × 107 CFU/L in water for drinking. In a previous assessment, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for the target species, consumers and the environment but could not…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural safety and regulations · Vitamin K Research Studies · Intellectual Property and Patents
