Correction to “Assessment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Development of the Nasal Polyp Patient Assessment Scoring Sheet Tool”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSinusitis and nasal conditions
S. Alsaleh, N. Kamal, C. Hopkins, et al., “Assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: development of the Nasal Polyp Patient Assessment Scoring tool,” Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 9, no. 3 (2024): e1277, https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1277.
- Figures 2 and 3 are now updated with an additional reference (now reference 20). This is reflected in the section on SNOT‐22.
Reference 20 — National Comparative Audit of Surgery for Nasal Polyposis and Rhinosinusitis, Royal College of Surgeons of England. SINO‐NASAL OUTCOME TEST (SNOT‐22). https://bpb‐us‐w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl.edu/dist/1/3538/files/2022/06/English_United‐States_S22_2019‐12‐24_Review‐Only.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2025.
A disclaimer stating “All rights reserved. Copyright 2006. Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.” has been added to the SNOT‐22 tool to ensure compliance with the copyright clause of Washington University.
- In Figures 4A and 4B, modifications were made to ensure resemblance to the SNOT‐22 tool. The figures were modified to appear as in the link provided (without modification or editing).This is to ensure complete compliance with the copyright notice of Washington University.Link: https://otolaryngologyoutcomesresearch.wustl.edu/research/clinical‐research/sinusitus/sino‐nasal‐outcome‐tests‐snot/Additionally, a new reference was added (now reference 20) to ensure comprehensiveness.
- Tables 1 and 2 have been updated under the SNOT‐22 domain. Two references have been added to ensure comprehensiveness: a new reference (now reference 20) and an update with the old reference (previously 20 and now updated to 21).
Reference 20 — National Comparative Audit of Surgery for Nasal Polyposis and Rhinosinusitis, Royal College of Surgeons of England. SINO‐NASAL OUTCOME TEST (SNOT‐22). https://bpb‐us‐w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl.edu/dist/1/3538/files/2022/06/English_United‐States_S22_2019‐12‐24_Review‐Only.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2025.
Reference 21 (previously 20 and updated to 21) — Toma S, Hopkins C. Stratification of SNOT‐22 scores into mild, moderate or severe and relationship with other subjective instruments. Rhinology. 2016;54(2):129–133. doi:10.4193/Rhino15.072.
We apologize for these errors.