# From a Measure of Confidence to a Measure of the Level of Knowledge

**Authors:** Daniel Defays

PMC · DOI: 10.5334/pb.1332 · Psychologica Belgica · 2025-05-22

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a model that treats confidence as a measure of knowledge level, revealing individual differences in how people calibrate their confidence over time.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is a model that estimates knowledge level from confidence variations, accounting for individual calibration errors.

## Key findings

- Confidence degrees vary significantly at the individual level over time.
- The model reveals hidden individual profiles under general overestimation bias.
- Predictions about individual calibration errors can be made using the model.

## Abstract

Confidence degrees assigned by respondents to their responses are generally taken at their face value. An experiment where respondents were asked to indicate twice their confidence in their (changed or unchanged) response has, however, showed that those confidences can greatly vary over time at the individual level. I propose a model that takes that variation into account and considers confidence as a latent variable – the level of knowledge – to be estimated through a true score approach. The model is defined in the special case of a scale with a given number of confidence degrees. It assumes that when faced with this type of testing requirements, a person experiences uncertainty in a way that can be represented by a finite set of partial knowledge states. It leans mainly on a conditional independence assumption. As the model is intractable under that sole assumption, additional testable and simple constraints must be imposed on the way confidence errors are distributed. The model was applied to data collected in the experiment. The results show that, under a general (population) overestimation bias, very different individual profiles are hidden with different distributions of errors. The model enables also to make predictions about one single individual by only examining his (her) calibration errors. Some errors patterns observed on the replicated data can indeed be anticipated with the proposed models.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** H (MESH:D000848)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12101119/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12101119/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12101119/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12101119