TL;DR
This paper thanks the reviewers of Psychologica Belgica for their hard work and contributions to the journal's quality.
Contribution
The paper highlights the importance of peer reviewers in maintaining the journal's standards.
Findings
Manuscripts are assessed by expert reviewers.
Reviewers' input is highly appreciated by editors and authors.
The journal's quality depends on reviewers' constructive feedback.
Abstract
All manuscripts published in Psychologica Belgica have been assessed conscientiously and unselfishly by expert reviewers. The quality of our journal totally depends on their valuable and constructive criticisms to the authors. Both the editors and the authors highly appreciate the input and dedication of all our reviewers. Many thanks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Psychological Treatments and Assessments · Human auditory perception and evaluation
Ellen Greimel
Marcos Romero
Pascalle Spaan
Elinor Waite
Nathalie Delobbe
Dirk van Dierendonck
ntsame-sima Murielle
Andrea Chirico
Francisca Rodriguez
Veronique Maheux-Caron
Etienne Quertemont
Pierre De Oliveira
Pierre Le Denmat
Marc Macé
Patricia Bijttebier
Sofie Weyn
Wan-Lan Chen
Berre Deltomme
Hayley Pearce
Tim Vestner
Asanka Gunasekara
Elodie Pools
Bruno Rossion
Joachim Waterschoot
Lorenz Rapp
Wolf Mehling
Li Haoran
Leentje Vervoort
Liesbeth Bogaert
Annelies Raes
Angelika Stefan
Man Chen
Lien Goossens
Patrick Onghena
Kimberly Barchard
Thom Volker
Iuliana Mihaela Lazar
Vera Hoorens
Oscar Astivia
Marie-Anne Schelstraete
Christian Blötner
David Wo
Andreas Stengel
Thorsten Rudroff
Jan Van Der Linden
Sandra Invernizzi
Celine Baeyens
Gerly Tamm