# The ‘Where, What, How and Who’ of Head Accelerations in Rugby Union. Head Acceleration Events From Men's and Women's Northern and Southern Hemisphere Competitions

## TL;DR

This study compares head acceleration events in men's and women's rugby, finding that men experience higher rates, especially during tackles and ball carries.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into head acceleration differences between men's and women's rugby and across contact events.

## Key findings

- Men had significantly higher head acceleration event rates than women in most positions and thresholds.
- Tackles and ball carries caused the highest head acceleration events in both men and women.
- Individual player variability was high, with some players experiencing up to three times the positional average.

## Abstract

This study aimed to quantify and compare mean head acceleration event (HAE) incidence within and between men's and women's rugby union competitions; quantify the incidence of HAEs during all contact‐events and describe individual player incidence. Players competing during the 2022/2023 season in women's (337 players; Premiership Women's Rugby, Farah Palmer Cup) and men's (371 players; Premiership Rugby, Currie Cup and Super Rugby) competitions wore instrumented mouthguards (iMGs). Mean HAE incidences using peak linear (PLA) and peak angular acceleration (PAA) were quantified by sex, positional groups and individual players per competition and for contact‐events across a range of magnitude thresholds. Within positional groups, there was high between‐player variability, with some players experiencing up to a 3‐fold greater mean HAE incidence than their positional average. Per full‐game equivalent (FGE), men had significantly higher HAE incidences in most positional groups and HAE magnitude thresholds compared to women ranging from approximately 0.11–3.44 HAEs per FGE. Incidence of HAEs (PLA > 25 g) per FGE was lowest in scrums (0.00–0.04/FGE) and highest for tackles and ball carries (0.21–1.97/FGE) in both women and men, whereas mauling was a frequent source of HAEs for men's back row (0.95/FGE). No significant differences were observed between competitions for most positional groups and HAE magnitude thresholds in both men and women. Per FGE, HAE incidences were similar within, but significant differences were apparent between men's and women's players. The scrum had the lowest HAE incidence of all contact‐events. Individual players can show large variation from the mean, emphasising the importance of HAE mitigation strategies that include individual player monitoring and management processes.