# Physician-Assisted Dying Witnessed by Emergency Medical Services: A Case Report

## TL;DR

This case report describes an emergency medical team's experience with a patient who chose to use physician-assisted dying while in their care, highlighting the need for clearer protocols.

## Contribution

The paper presents a real-world case that reveals gaps in EMS protocols and training regarding physician-assisted dying.

## Key findings

- EMS responders faced legal and ethical uncertainty when a patient requested to ingest PAD medication during their care.
- The case underscores the need for clear EMS protocols and education on PAD to protect responders and uphold patient rights.
- Documentation and communication with medical control were critical in resolving the situation.

## Abstract

Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is a practice that allows terminally ill patients to self-administer prescribed lethal medication. In the 11 states in the United States where PAD is legal, the incidence of PAD cases is rapidly rising. Despite most of these cases occurring in the out-of-hospital setting, states lack specific emergency medical services (EMS) protocols to guide prehospital responders who may encounter PAD in the field. We report a case in which a patient called 9-1-1 for a medical emergency and requested to ingest her prescribed lethal medication while in EMS care.

Emergency medical services was dispatched for a 56-year-old female bleeding from her tracheostomy stoma. Despite the EMS responders’ recommendation, the patient refused transport and instead requested to ingest her PAD medication. The crew, unfamiliar with PAD laws, were unsure whether they could legally honor the patient’s refusal. Clinicians consulted with online medical control, who were also unaware of PAD. After extensive deliberation, the crew decided to honor the patient’s refusal and thoroughly document the situation. The patient self-administered her medication as EMS cleared the scene.

This case highlights logistical challenges and ethical dilemmas faced by EMS responders and underscores the complexity of balancing patient autonomy with legal and medical responsibilities in prehospital situations involving PAD. As PAD becomes increasingly prevalent, equipping EMS responders with clear protocols and providing ongoing education about prehospital PAD cases are vital for preserving patient rights while protecting the responders from legal and ethical uncertainty.