# Urban bumblebees diversify their foraging strategy to maintain nutrient intake

**Authors:** Simonetta Selva, Marco Moretti, Fabian A. Ruedenauer, Alexander Keller, Bertrand Fournier, Sara Diana Leonhardt, Helen Eggenberger, Joan Casanelles Abella

PMC · DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0639 · 2025-05-21

## TL;DR

Urban bumblebees adjust their foraging to maintain nutrient intake despite changes in their environment.

## Contribution

Urban bumblebees diversify their diet breadth to maintain consistent nutrient intake in cities with higher floral diversity.

## Key findings

- Urban bumblebees have a broader diet breadth compared to rural ones due to higher floral diversity in cities.
- Nutrient intake remains similar between urban and rural bumblebees despite differences in diet breadth.
- Urban bumblebees show distinct pollen-transport patterns compared to rural individuals.

## Abstract

Anthropogenic ecosystems can alter individual functions and ecological processes such as resource use and species interactions. While variability of morphological traits involved in diet and resource use has been observed between urban and non-urban populations of pollinators, the consequences on the dietary and pollen-transport patterns remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the variability in the diet breadth of rural and urban individuals of two bumblebee species and the consequences for nutrient intake and pollen transport. We show that urban bumblebees exhibit a larger diet breadth than their rural counterparts, driven by the enhanced floral diversity in cities. However, we found that the nutrient intake remained similar across urban and rural ecosystems, indicating that bumblebees' foraging strategies can be adapted in terms of diet breadth to maintain intake and ratios of critical nutrients. We also found distinct pollen-transport patterns between urban and rural individuals, with urban individuals being more dissimilar than rural ones in the transported pollen both in the body and in the leg baskets. Our findings highlight the importance of considering complementary facets of species’ diet and interactions when assessing the effects of anthropogenic ecosystems.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** P (MESH:D010758), sugar (MESH:D000073893), lipid (MESH:D008055), AA (MESH:D000596), FA (MESH:D005227), omega 3 (-)
- **Species:** Proboscis (genus) [taxon 366163], Lotus corniculatus (species) [taxon 47247], Bombus lapidarius (species) [taxon 30192], Trifolium repens (creeping white clover, species) [taxon 3899], Bombus (bumble bees, genus) [taxon 28641], Apis mellifera (bee, species) [taxon 7460], Trifolium pratense (peavine clover, species) [taxon 57577], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Bombus pascuorum (species) [taxon 65598]

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12092122/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12092122