Comparison of efficacy and adverse effects of CD19/20 CART versus CD19 single-target CART in R/R DLBCL: a single-center retrospective study
Bin Xue, Yifan Liu, Bing Li, Yan Lu, Lili Zhou, Shiguang Ye, Huina Lu, Xiu Luo, Aibin Liang, Ping Li

TL;DR
This study compares the effectiveness and side effects of dual-target versus single-target CAR T-cell therapy in treating a type of aggressive blood cancer.
Contribution
The study provides new clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of dual-target CD19/20 CAR T-cell therapy compared to single-target CD19 therapy in R/R DLBCL.
Findings
Dual-target CD19/20 CAR T-cell therapy showed significantly higher complete response rates and longer median survival compared to single-target CD19 therapy.
The dual-target therapy was associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects like cytokine release syndrome and infections.
There was no significant difference in overall progression-free survival or duration of response between the two therapies.
Abstract
CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy (CART) represents a groundbreaking approach in the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, a subset of patients fails to achieve optimal outcomes with CD19-targeted CAR T-cells alone. To address these limitations, the development of multi-targeted CART therapies has become a focal point of innovative research. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse events of dual-target versus single-target CART therapies in R/R DLBCL patients through a single-center retrospective analysis. We included 70 patients with R/R DLBCL treated at Shanghai Tongji Hospital between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Among them, 20 patients received dual-target (CD19/20) CART, while 50 underwent CD19 CART. The CD19/20 CART group demonstrated significantly superior three-month efficacy to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCAR-T cell therapy research · Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment · CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
