# Clash of the Invaders: Competition Dynamics of Bromus tectorum and Ventenata dubia in an Addition Series Study

**Authors:** Lilly Sencenbaugh, Bruce D. Maxwell, Lisa J. Rew

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.71458 · Ecology and Evolution · 2025-05-19

## TL;DR

This study examines how two invasive grasses, Bromus tectorum and Ventenata dubia, compete with each other and themselves, finding that interspecific competition affects both similarly.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the competitive dynamics between two invasive grass species using an addition series greenhouse experiment.

## Key findings

- Both species were more affected by interspecific than intraspecific competition.
- Relative competitive ability values were less than 1, indicating no competitive advantage for either species.
- Germination timing differences may influence management effectiveness.

## Abstract

Competitive interactions between co‐occurring invasive species can have detrimental impacts on native communities and cause counter‐effective responses to management. Targeted removal of one invader may allow for the release of a subdominant invader, causing a secondary invasion. The goal of this research was to elucidate competitive dynamics between 
Bromus tectorum
 and 
Ventenata dubia, two invasive winter annual grasses found in the western United States. We quantified the impacts of (1) intraspecific competition on 
B. tectorum
 and 
V. dubia
 as the density of conspecifics increased and (2) interspecific competition between the two at varying proportions. The two species were grown at increasing densities and proportions (addition series) over 10 weeks in a greenhouse. Aboveground biomass was harvested and weighed. We derived the intraspecific and interspecific competitive effects on each species with a nonlinear analysis and used these coefficients to determine relative competitive ability (RCA). Both species were impacted by interspecific competition and intraspecific competition. More conspecifics were required to cause a decline in both species' biomass relative to the number of allospecifics that caused the same response. Interestingly, the number of allospecific individuals to imposed an impact was similar. The RCA values for both species were < 1, which indicated that interspecific competition had a greater influence on both species than intraspecific competition. This suggests that the replacement of 
B. tectorum
 by 
V. dubia
 is unlikely to be caused by aboveground competition alone. However, there are differences in germination timing between the two species; both germinate in the fall, but 
V. dubia
 also germinates in the spring. Management that targets fall‐germinating individuals may reduce 
B. tectorum
 and fall‐germinating 
V. dubia
 but not impact spring‐germinating 
V. dubia, which may release these individuals from competition. Understanding the competitive interactions between these species provides insight into invasive species impacts and management.

Competitive interactions between co‐occurring invasive species can have detrimental impacts on native community composition and cause countereffective responses to management. The goal of this research was to elucidate competitive dynamics between Bromus tectorum and Ventenata dubia, two invasive winter annual grasses found in the western United States by quantifying the impacts of intraspecific and interspecific competition between the two at varying proportions. We found that both species were most impacted by interspecific competition, though neither had an advantage over the other.B. tectorum has a sl

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Bromus tectorum (taxon 29667), Ventenata dubia (taxon 388728)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Bromus tectorum (brome-de-toits, species) [taxon 29667], Ventenata dubia (species) [taxon 388728]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12086993/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12086993/full.md

## References

77 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12086993/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12086993