Transforming Surgery With Artificial Intelligence: An Early Analysis of Private Industry Trends
Yash B Shah, Akshay S Krishnan, Zachary N Goldberg, Varun Jayanti, Erika D Harness, David B Nash

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the growth of private AI companies in surgery, highlighting their focus areas and financial trends.
Contribution
The study provides an early analysis of private industry AI trends in surgery, emphasizing product aims and financial investment.
Findings
Most AI companies in surgery focus on general surgery and orthopedics.
Intraoperative image analysis and diagnostic imaging are the most common product categories.
AI surgical robotics autonomy and high industry valuation are notable trends.
Abstract
Introduction: The recent growth and integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical products have the potential to revolutionize surgical care. The private sector is largely responsible for this innovation. We aimed to characterize the growth, aims, and finances of private industry AI solutions within surgery. Methods: An initial search using the CB Insights market intelligence platform returned 126 private companies; 20 met the exclusion criteria. Three independent reviewers extracted variables of interest, including company demographics, product classification, surgical subspecialty of interest, funding, valuation, and acquisition status. Product purpose and functionality were characterized in detail. Results: The first company was founded in 2003, with 50% (n=53) founded between 2015 and 2019. General surgery (n=57) and orthopedics (n=21) were the most common surgical…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Companies | Category | Product | Specialty | Country | Year founded |
| True Digital Surgery | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered tool allowing advanced surgical microscopy | General | United States | 2003 |
| Hongyun Rongtong | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered provider-provider telecommunication for remote intraoperative consultation | General | China | 2008 |
| Shareable Forms | Routine physician tasks/paperwork | Enterprise EHR analytics for peri- and intraoperative patient monitoring | General | United States | 2009 |
| XSurgical Robotics | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to assist and perform surgeries | General | Italy | 2009 |
| Sensoria | Post-op monitoring device | AI-powered wearable devices to track movement post-surgery | Orthopedic | United States | 2010 |
| Gauss Surgical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered tracking of real-time blood loss via analysis of video footage | General | United States | 2011 |
| DeGen Medical | Physician education through surgical prep | AI/AR platform to help surgeons plan and practice spinal surgeries | Orthopedic | United States | 2011 |
| Avamed Synergy | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered intraoperative image analysis to improve outcomes | General | Spain | 2012 |
| nView medical | Diagnostic imaging | AI image recognition for diagnostic assistance pre- and post-op | Neurosurgery | United States | 2012 |
| Digital Surgery | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-powered mobile app providing surgical training and simulation | General | United Kingdom | 2013 |
| Caresyntax | OR workflow management | Platform enabling data-driven surgery to reduce variability and improve efficiency | General | Germany | 2013 |
| Neo | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI/AR platform to improve visualization during spinal surgery | Neurosurgery | Switzerland | 2013 |
| Fundamental Surgery | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-/VR-powered surgical training platform | General | United Kingdom | 2013 |
| DocSpera | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | General | United States | 2013 |
| Deshang Yunxing | Diagnostic imaging | AI image recognition for diagnostic assistance, surgery planning, and intraoperative surgical guidance | General | China | 2013 |
| Perceive3D | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AR platform to improve intraoperative visualization | Orthopedic | Portugal | 2013 |
| Zhongzhi Daxin | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-powered tools for surgical planning, online collaboration, and 3D printing | General | China | 2014 |
| Cydar Medical | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | Cardiovascular | United Kingdom | 2014 |
| Axial3D | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered platform to make virtual and 3D printed models for surgical planning | Orthopedic | United Kingdom | 2014 |
| Vibronix | Diagnostic imaging | AI image recognition for diagnostic assistance, surgery planning, and intraoperative surgical guidance | General | United States | 2014 |
| PeerWell | Post-op monitoring device | AI-powered wearable device to improve preoperative patient readiness | Orthopedic | United States | 2015 |
| Saykara | Routine physician tasks/paperwork | AI-powered analysis of appointment audio for automatic charting | General | United States | 2015 |
| Reveal Surgical | Diagnostic pathology | AI-assisted intraoperative visualization and cancer detection tool | Neurosurgery | Canada | 2015 |
| ME3D | Physician education through simulation and training | AI/AR tool to train surgeons how to stitch blood vessels | General | Hungary | 2015 |
| Oxford Heartbeat | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-powered platform to make virtual and 3D printed models for surgical planning | Neurosurgery | United Kingdom | 2015 |
| PTX Therapy | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered personalized physical therapy course | General | United States | 2015 |
| Unify Medical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI/AR platform to improve visualization through 3D models and AI-enhanced magnification | General | United States | 2015 |
| OrthoGrid Systems | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered intraoperative surgical assistance using fluoroscopy data | Orthopedic | United States | 2015 |
| AUTONOMUS | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to perform ultrasound-guided surgeries | General | United States | 2015 |
| Keya Medical | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered CT angiograph reader to assess coronary artery function | Cardiovascular | China | 2016 |
| BossCome | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered tool to improve image-guided surgeries | General | China | 2016 |
| TriOcula | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-/AR-/VR-powered surgical training platform | General | India | 2016 |
| Formus Labs | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered platform to make virtual and 3D printed models for surgical planning and implantation | Orthopedic | New Zealand | 2016 |
| Ceevra | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered platform to make 3D printed models for surgical planning | General | United States | 2016 |
| Proprio | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AR/VR technology providing immersive surgical vision | Orthopedic | United States | 2016 |
| CognitiveDOC | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered app to reduce readmission | Orthopedic | United States | 2016 |
| UpFlux | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | General | Brazil | 2017 |
| IHS | Physician education through simulation and training | VR-/AI-powered surgical training platform using haptic simulation | General | China | 2017 |
| Changmugu Medical | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered platform to aid diagnostics, operative planning, and 3D printing design for custom bones and prosthetics | Orthopedic | China | 2017 |
| International Rehabilitation Institute | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered postoperative rehabilitation monitoring | Orthopedic | China | 2017 |
| LaraLab | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-powered software for preprocedural surgical planning | Cardiovascular | Germany | 2017 |
| Healthplus.ai | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered prediction of post-surgical complications | General | Netherlands | 2017 |
| Hutom | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered platform providing preoperative anatomy modeling, surgical visualization, and detection of intraoperative events for intraoperative images | General | South Korea | 2017 |
| Activ Surgical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI/AR/ML platform that enables real-time surgical landmarking | General | United States | 2017 |
| OpticSurg | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-/AR-powered provider-provider telecommunication for remote intraoperative consultation | General | United States | 2017 |
| Pathware | Diagnostic pathology | AI-assisted intraoperative visualization and cancer detection tool | Oncology | United States | 2017 |
| Med Cloud Tech | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered platform to improve visualization during screw placement | Orthopedic | United States | 2017 |
| Kaliber.ai | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered suite of tools allowing patients and providers to analyze segments of the surgery | Orthopedic | United States | 2017 |
| InformAI | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered predictive analytics using imaging and test results to predict treatment plans, transplant outcomes, and presence of disease | Transplant | United States | 2017 |
| Medicalfile | Routine physician tasks/paperwork | AI-powered EHR allowing for faster information entry | General | Mexico | 2017 |
| Scalpel | OR workflow management | AI-powered surgical inventory management | General | United Kingdom | 2017 |
| True Health | Diagnostic imaging | AI image recognition for diagnostic assistance pre- and post-op | General | China | 2018 |
| Ganymed Robotics | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to assist with knee replacement and improve visualization | Orthopedic | France | 2018 |
| Theator | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-powered platform analyzing surgical recordings to train residents and increase efficiency and consistency | General | United States | 2018 |
| Zeta Surgical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered platform to improve image-guided surgeries | Neurosurgery | United States | 2018 |
| CytoVeris | Diagnostic pathology | AI-/ML-assisted intraoperative visualization and cancer detection | Oncology | United States | 2018 |
| Boea Wisdom | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-powered software using patient scans to assist with preoperative tasks and planning | Cardiovascular | China | 2019 |
| Yurui Innovation | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-powered surgical planning and postoperative feedback | General | China | 2019 |
| Caranx Medical | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to assist with cardiac- and obesity-related surgeries | General | France | 2019 |
| Taurean Surgical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-enhanced surgical microscopy | General | India | 2019 |
| Rxoom | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered intraoperative image analysis to improve neurosurgeon navigation | Neurosurgery | India | 2019 |
| iMed Technologies | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI/AR platform to improve visualization during neurovascular surgery | Neurosurgery | Japan | 2019 |
| Kyalio | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-/VR-powered surgical training platform | General | Singapore | 2019 |
| Pipra | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered data-driven prediction of postoperative delirium | General | Switzerland | 2019 |
| CaseCTRL | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for improved OR scheduling | General | United States | 2019 |
| NeuroVascular Research & Design | OR workflow management | AI-powered intraoperative documentation and monitoring | General | United States | 2019 |
| 8chili | Physician education through simulation and training | AR/ML program for remote collaborative surgical training | General | United States | 2019 |
| Remedy Logic | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered tool to increase MRI reading speeds | Neurosurgery | United States | 2019 |
| MS Pen Technologies | Diagnostic pathology | AI-assisted intraoperative visualization and cancer detection tool | Oncology | United States | 2019 |
| Caira | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to assist with implant positioning and kinematics | Orthopedic | United States | 2019 |
| SurgAR | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AR platform to improve visualization and intraoperative decision-making | General | France | 2019 |
| AIkenist | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered suite of tools streamlining the entire imaging process | General | India | 2019 |
| Ortoma | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-assisted peri- and postoperative patient monitoring | Orthopedic | Sweden | 2019 |
| Skinopathy | Diagnostic imaging | AI image recognition for skin cancer screening and monitoring | Dermatology | Canada | 2020 |
| Oculotronics | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robots to perform ophthalmic surgery | Orthopedic | China | 2020 |
| Alviss.ai | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered predictive analytics using CT scans to predict the risk of complications like pulmonary embolism | Cardiovascular | France | 2020 |
| Anaut | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-/DL-powered mapping of surgical images for improved navigation | General | Japan | 2020 |
| Rootally AI | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered personalized physical therapy and wellness course | General | Singapore | 2020 |
| NATOO | Patient navigation | AI-powered tool for patients to choose their plastic surgery options | Plastics and Cosmetics | South Korea | 2020 |
| Apella | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical staff allocation | General | United States | 2020 |
| ORtelligence | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | General | United States | 2020 |
| Opollo Technologies | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | General | United States | 2020 |
| Cyberdontics | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to perform dental procedures | Plastics and Cosmetics | United States | 2020 |
| Saude iD | Patient navigation | AI-powered digital marketplace for patients seeking surgery | General | Brazil | 2020 |
| IRCAD | Physician education through simulation and training | AI-powered surgical training platform and novel surgical technique development | General | France | 2020 |
| Your Physio | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered personalized physical therapy course | Orthopedic | India | 2020 |
| Nervio | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered surgeon monitors to stop complications before they happen | Neurosurgery | Israel | 2020 |
| QAS.AI | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered intraoperative angiogram and perfusion analysis | Neurosurgery | United States | 2020 |
| Oma Robotics | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to perform single cell surgery | Fertility | United States | 2020 |
| Vope Medical | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI-powered software for endoscope cleaning | General | Canada | 2021 |
| AMIT | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to perform ultrasound-guided ablations | General | China | 2021 |
| AIMIRA | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to perform cosmetic procedures | Plastics and Cosmetics | China | 2021 |
| TrackiMed | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot to manage the OR and assist with procedures | General | Israel | 2021 |
| Proid | Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | AI- and 3D optics-powered platform to improve tumor visualization | Oncology | South Korea | 2021 |
| Connecteve | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered software to assist with pre- and postoperative tasks and planning | Orthopedic | South Korea | 2021 |
| BiteRight | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered platform to make custom dental implants | Plastics and Cosmetics | Spain | 2021 |
| Sterile Vision | OR workflow management | AI-powered surgical inventory management | General | United States | 2021 |
| Innobot Health | Routine physician tasks/paperwork | AI-powered automation of eligibility, authorization, appeal, record request, and payment forms | General | United States | 2021 |
| Bonescreen | Diagnostic imaging | AI image and biomarker recognition for diagnostic assistance | Orthopedic | Germany | 2022 |
| INFINEIS | Diagnostic imaging | AI-powered tool to make custom surgical implants | General | France | 2022 |
| Scichip | Robotic surgical support | AI-powered robot and software to plan and perform laparoscopic surgeries | General | India | 2022 |
| Med4cast | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered data-driven prediction of postoperative outcomes | Orthopedic | Switzerland | 2022 |
| Aivigo | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered personalized physical therapy course | General | Turkey | 2022 |
| Oculotix | Physician education through surgical prep | AI-powered tool to help match patients with the correct lenses | Ophthalmology | United States | 2022 |
| W.AI | Post-op monitoring software | AI-powered software to monitor breast implants for complications | Plastics and Cosmetics | South Korea | 2023 |
| Exin Health | OR workflow management | Enterprise solution for clinical workflow and surgical resource management | General | United States | 2023 |
| Year founded | n (%) |
| Before 2010 | 4 (3.8%) |
| 2010-2014 | 16 (15.1%) |
| 2015-2019 | 53 (50%) |
| 2020-present | 33 (31.1%) |
| Category | n (%) | Description |
| Surgical support through intraoperative image analysis | 25 (23.6%) | Analysis of images taken during a procedure to improve the surgeon's view of the surgical site |
| Diagnostic imaging | 18 (17%) | Analysis of images taken outside of surgery to aid in diagnosis |
| OR workflow management | 12 (11.3%) | Platforms which optimize the allocation of surgical resources including OR time, personnel time, and equipment |
| Robotic surgical support | 12 (11.3%) | Robots to assist surgeons or perform surgeries alone |
| Post-op monitoring software | 10 (9.4%) | Software designed to improve patient recovery after surgery |
| Physician education through simulation and training | 10 (9.4%) | Simulation programs to help train residents on how to perform surgery |
| Physician education through surgical prep | 7 (6.6%) | Programs to help surgeons practice and plan for specific surgical cases |
| Diagnostic pathology | 4 (3.8%) | Devices that analyze a tissue sample to determine if it is cancerous or not in real time |
| Routine physician tasks/paperwork | 4 (3.8%) | Products which automatically perform tasks so surgeons do not need to |
| Patient navigation | 2 (1.9%) | Products which help patients navigate the surgical system |
| Postoperative monitoring devices | 2 (1.9%) | Devices which allow care teams to monitor patients after surgery |
| Funding | n | Collective funding (millions) | % of total funding |
| Less than $5 million | 23 | $29.06 | 2.7% |
| $5-40 million | 23 | $273.17 | 25.4% |
| Greater than $40 million | 9 | $773.14 | 71.9% |
| Total | 55 | $1,075.37 | 100% |
| Valuation | n | Collective valuation (millions) | % of total valuation |
| Less than $10 million | 4 | $23.85 | 2.2% |
| $10-24 million | 6 | $107.10 | 9.7% |
| $25-100 million | 6 | $357.21 | 32.4% |
| Greater than $100 million | 3 | $614.82 | 55.7% |
| Total | 19 | $1,102.98 | 100% |
| Country | n | Total funding (million) | % of total |
| Brazil | 1 | $9.25 | 0.9% |
| Canada | 1 | $0.02 | 0% |
| China | 6 | $232.78 | 21.6% |
| France | 3 | $45.45 | 4.2% |
| Germany | 2 | $208.98 | 19.4% |
| Japan | 1 | $1.61 | 0.1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | $5.75 | 0.5% |
| Portugal | 1 | $0.57 | 0.1% |
| Singapore | 1 | $0.88 | 0.1% |
| South Korea | 5 | $22.01 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | $0.87 | 0.1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | $50.57 | 4.7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | $70.13 | 6.5% |
| United States | 25 | $426.71 | 39.7% |
| Total | 55 | $1075.58 | 100% |
| Country | n | Total valuation (million) | % of total |
| China | 2 | $17.4 | 1.6% |
| Germany | 1 | $366.23 | 33.2% |
| South Korea | 2 | $89.65 | 8.1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | $14.14 | 1.3% |
| United States | 13 | $615.56 | 55.8% |
| Total | 19 | $1102.98 | 100% |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSurgical Simulation and Training · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Introduction
Attention surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medicine has dramatically increased in recent years [1]. While no literature has published the percent increase in AI use, a significant amount of literature about AI use in healthcare has been published. For example, one study found 43,485 articles on AI in elderly healthcare [2]. AI may increase diagnostic validity and patient safety, predict therapeutic response, and even accelerate clinical research processes [3-6]. Initial forays in the late 20th century involved simple AI tools that supported clinician decision-making by providing recommendations using predefined rules and a defined fund of medical knowledge (e.g., MYCIN); this has since evolved with the advent of big data analytics and deep learning (DL) algorithms [7].
Scalable devices like wearables have increased private sector engagement in population health data collection and research [8]. For example, the Apple Heart Study, which began in 2018, compared the accuracy of Apple Watch data against ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) in identifying atrial fibrillation, finding an 84% positive predictive value [9]. These technologies reflect the potential of generative AI, a subset of DL.
AI has also been incorporated into surgical care, supporting the allocation of post-anesthesia beds, prediction of case cancellations, enhancement of robotic movements and visibility, and creation of written materials such as patient education or clinical documents [10-12]. Surgical process analysis has been facilitated by breaking down individual surgical movements into "surgemes" (e.g., pulling a needle through tissue or transferring a needle from one hand to the other), which allows the computerized analysis, replication, and understanding of surgical tasks [13].
While academic and public sector research has laid the groundwork for AI in surgery, it is the private industry that has propelled these innovations into real-world applications [14]. For example, an investigation into the funding of 41 biopharmaceutical agents that received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval found that 97.4% of funding came from the private sector [15]. AI giants like NVIDIA and established healthcare companies like Johnson & Johnson have collaborated on innovative technologies in surgical virtual reality (VR) and education. This emerging industry appears poised to expand its impact across surgical specialties and will have significant impacts on the role of surgeons in the coming decades. Our study aimed to analyze private sector companies offering surgical AI products.
Materials and methods
CB Insights (CBI) database
The CBI market intelligence platform gathers data about private companies and investments to track market trends across a variety of sectors. This tool has been previously utilized to analyze private industry investments in healthcare [16-18]. The present study utilized the Artificial Intelligence Expert Collection, which contained 13,607 listings. The Healthcare & Life Sciences Industry categorization was utilized to ultimately identify private companies for inclusion.
Search and cohort identification
The search was conducted on March 10, 2024. The Boolean keyword search "artificial intelligence AND surgery" was utilized to filter the original database. The initial search yielded 126 results. Following the identification of this cohort, three independent reviewers viewed the company URLs provided by CBI. Further, all reviewers utilized Google Search to investigate each listing further. This investigation served as a check on CBI to ensure the selected companies met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria included duplicates, inactive companies, and those that did not create surgical products involving AI. Companies were determined to involve AI or not based on the centrality of AI to their product, such as considering if the product was built around AI or if the product could function the same without AI integration. Disagreements between reviewers were discussed until a consensus was reached.
Data analysis
Variables of interest included the company's founding date, location of headquarters, total funding in 2024 US dollars (USD), most recent valuation, and most recent acquisition, if applicable. Further, the company's mission, proposed product, market status of product, surgical subspecialty of interest, and classification of product type were gathered. Information was gathered from CBI profiles, the company's website, and supporting articles from Google Search in that order. Data on collaboration with academic institutions, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, or other grant support was unavailable.
If a company fit into general surgery or multiple specialties or involved generic surgical tasks, it was categorized as "General". Product classifications included surgical support through intraoperative image analysis (including surgical microscopy, recording of procedures, and endoscopic or robotic video output), diagnostic imaging, diagnostic pathology, operating room (OR) workflow management, robotic surgical support (control of surgical robots), physician education through simulation and training, physician education through preoperative surgical preparation, routine physician tasks and paperwork, patient navigation, postoperative monitoring software, and postoperative monitoring devices.
Market status was classified as "Active" if the product was currently being sold or had been approved by the FDA or equivalent regulatory body for sale, while it was classified as "Under Development" if the company was in the seed funding, research and development, or early product trial phases at select healthcare sites.
Results
Company demographics
The CBI search returned 126 companies, of which 17 (13.5%) were excluded from the study due to inactivity (11), lack of surgical uses (four), or lack of AI incorporation (two). An additional three companies (2.4%) were eliminated for being duplicates. In total, 106 private companies creating surgical products using AI were included in the analysis (Table 1). Companies were headquartered on all inhabited continents. The United States had the most companies (n=42), followed by China (n=14). France, India, and the United Kingdom each had six companies, and South Korea had five companies. No other country had more than three companies.
The earliest company was founded in 2003, with less than 5% of companies being founded before 2010 (n=4). Fifty percent of the companies were founded between 2015 and 2019 (n=53), and 2019 was the year with the most companies founded (n=17) (Table 2). In total, 56 (52.8%) companies had products actively available in the market.
Classification of products
Distribution by surgical subspecialty was also assessed. While most companies were classified as General (n=57), Orthopedics (n=21) was also highly common, followed by Neurosurgery (n=10), Plastics and Cosmetics (n=5), Cardiovascular (n=5), and Oncology (n=4). Dermatology, Fertility, Ophthalmology, and Transplant each had one company.
The type of product or service provided was further categorized (Table 3). A plurality of products offered surgical support through intraoperative image analysis (n=25). These can improve intraoperative visualization and navigation of the surgical site. Additional uses included enhanced surgical microscopy, tracking of blood loss, or identification of landmarks and structures such as tumors.
The next most common product type was diagnostic imaging (n=18). These products analyze imaging taken before surgery to aid in diagnosis and surgical planning or the creation of 3D models for operative planning, surgical implant design, or risk prediction.
OR workflow management and robotic surgical support were the third most common product type (n=12). The former optimizes the flow of the OR through improved resource allocation or tracking of surgical resources, ultimately aiming to reduce cost, increase efficiency, and improve patient safety. Robotic surgical support products are designed to assist surgeons in performing procedures or complete procedures autonomously. These companies aim to increase standardization and safety of various surgeries while alleviating the burden on surgeons or improving efficiency.
Financial analysis
Of the 106 companies with surgical products using AI, six had been acquired at the time of data collection. These six companies came from General (n=4) and Orthopedics (n=2).
Fifty-six (52.8%) companies received venture capital investment. Fifty-five (51.9%) companies had funding information available. In total, this cohort of the industry saw 19,550,000, while the median funding was 207,500,000, while the lowest, Vope Medical, received 1.10 billion for the 19 companies with valuation data available. The mean valuation was 23,970,000. These funding values include money from private and government sources. Table 4 displays funding and Table 5 displays valuations for companies creating surgical products using AI. Table 6 displays funding and Table 7 displays valuations for all companies divided by where the company is headquartered.
Discussion
Our study found that a wide range of companies, at various stages of development, are aiming to integrate advanced AI technologies into surgery. This trend is observed worldwide, though the most innovation is concentrated in the United States and China. This is expected as these countries are leading the front on innovation, technology, and medical science. While this trend has been seen for two decades, there has been increased growth in recent years. Funding is highly variable among companies, and the reasons for this variation are unclear. Possible explanations include differences in regulatory environments and confidence in company leadership. Further research is needed to explore the exact differences and their causes. Despite these differences, in total, this is a billion-dollar industry that bears notice. The billion-dollar valuation is likely an underestimate as around one-half of the studied companies lacked publicly available financial information or data that were unavailable in the CBI database. Further, it is likely that CBI was not a comprehensive database and missed relevant active companies.
Given the strong funding support and venture capital interest, it is reasonable to expect that AI integration into surgery will continue to expand. Therefore, it remains of interest to characterize this work and its potential to impact surgical patient experiences and the role of surgeons in the coming decades. Surgeons who are informed about this trend may positively guide new technologies to ensure patient-centered design and development.
Industry efforts are largely focused on facilitating the role of the surgeon to improve the efficiency and quality of care delivered [19]. The products offered by the companies in this study aim to simplify common tasks and overcome obstacles. For instance, intraoperative visualization and identification of key structures can be a routine challenge. Advanced technologies to facilitate this task can improve operative outcomes, such as reducing positive tumor margins or intraoperative bleeds, while yielding reduced operating times and mental burdens for the surgeon [19].
Proposed applications in surgical practice
Our study included 25 companies aiming to use OR video recording, surgical microscopy, or robotic video output to improve visualization for such purposes. Real-time assessment of bleeding using AI has been described in the literature and holds potential for reducing intraoperative morbidity [20]. One recent study showed the accurate detection of organs and surgical instruments using real-time gastrectomy video footage [21]. Similarly, effective cancer detection using video from endoscopy has been shown [22].
Assistance with preoperative diagnostics can alert physicians to key findings and help reduce complications, whether in missing an important finding or overtreating patients with lower-risk findings. AI use for spatial work in diagnostics, such as pathologic and radiologic analysis, has been demonstrated successfully [23]. In one study, a dataset of biopsy-proven high-risk breast lesions was used to train an algorithm to predict which patients needed surgical resection. The algorithm identified 30.6% of the resections performed as unnecessary [24]. In 2018, the FDA approved the first computer vision AI-driven medical device from LumineticsCore to identify diabetic retinopathy from patient images without the need for dilation [25].
Further, OR efficiency and safety culture oversight are areas ripe for technological improvement. AI-driven preoperative checklists and surgical time-out management can facilitate patient safety and reduce human error [26]. Utilizing AI to analyze surgical workflow and inventory, including staffing, scheduling, and the utilization of various materials and tools, can reduce waste and improve efficiency in an era of increasing costs and shortages.
Of further interest is the role of AI in training surgeons and assisting with preoperative planning [19]. The industry is heavily focused on improving the surgeon's ability to practice difficult procedures accurately and in high fidelity prior to treating real patients. This can ultimately improve surgeon comfort and skill while safeguarding the patient. As interest in simulation and VR rises, the integration of AI is promising [27].
Use cases
While this study focuses primarily on the economic and developmental trends surrounding AI integration in surgery, understanding the utility of these systems requires a look at how specific technologies are being used in practice. We, therefore, highlight several examples below to illustrate common applications.
Perhaps most exciting are the companies actively using AI within the OR. Activ Surgical has developed an AI-enabled imaging system for surgical landmarking, including real-time overlays of blood flow data on standard laparoscopic video. This assists surgeons in identifying poorly perfused tissue that may be at risk for complications. Proprio combines computer vision and mixed reality to create immersive visualizations of the surgical field, helping surgeons execute complex procedures with increased precision.
In the educational sphere, Theator analyzes video from past procedures to improve future performance, offering insights into technique variation and efficiency. Similarly, Kyalio has developed AI-driven training solutions, including performance analysis, structured feedback on technique, and remote collaboration with expert surgeons, particularly supporting practices in low-resource settings.
AI also holds increasing use in workflow management, reducing cost, turnover time, and resource utilization. CaseCTRL offers intelligent surgical planning by analyzing patient data and surgeon preferences to streamline case preparation and communication, minimizing last-minute changes and cancellations. ORtelligence focuses on logistics optimization by monitoring inventory, equipment usage, and workflow practices to reduce delays and waste. These diverse innovations demonstrate that AI is being developed not just for intraoperative assistance but also to improve coordination, resource management, and safety culture across the surgical care continuum.
These examples underscore the broader implications of AI in surgery, not only as a driver of investment and startup activity but as real tools with measurable impacts on surgical planning, visualization, and outcomes.
Risks of AI integration in surgery
The results of our study suggest that further research is needed to identify and minimize the serious risks of AI integration in surgical practice. It bears noting that 12 companies are proposing the integration of AI with surgical robots to reduce the role of the human surgeon in the OR. Image-guided procedures are particularly well-positioned to benefit from AI, which can automate decision-making and surgical movements [28]. It is essential to consider what role the human surgeon will be relegated to as they sit behind the console [29].
Importantly, device malfunctions are common, currently estimated at 75% of cases, and procedures must be designed to allow human surgeons to comfortably take over in case of complications [29]. Further, recent literature suggests that the need for humanism in patient interactions and the ability to determine when not to operate will remain the most vital characteristics of human surgeons [1].
Additional caution surrounds the potential for these technologies to exacerbate inequity and lack of access for rural or underserved populations. The infrastructure costs for information technology, data management, and technical support are immense [29]. Despite promises to democratize surgical education or patient access to world-class surgeons even in remote areas, these technologies may remain limited to well-funded and well-resourced academic institutions, possibly widening the gap [29].
Overall, the authors believe that there is an imminent need for a standardized approach to the assessment of new healthcare devices, including AI tools, similar to the rigorous approval process for pharmaceuticals [23]. A recent review of research on AI-enabled surgical decision support techniques found that scientific rigor and data reporting are suboptimal [30]. Without oversight, the accuracy and utility of these tools will remain unclear, and the determination of their safety for patients will be left up to individual physicians or institutions. Our analysis indicates that numerous such products are currently under design and will soon be available in practice.
Study limitations
This study has several limitations. Notably, while CBI offers the largest list of companies pursuing AI solutions in surgery, it is unclear whether this list is truly comprehensive [16-18]. Nonetheless, the authors are unaware of any other complementary database that may fill this gap. Similarly, several companies were missing financial data. Further, there is no publicly available stratified data on NIH funding or grants via academic collaborations. Though we have closely notated missing financial data in the results, there may be a bias in which companies had unavailable data. Further, there are a variety of definitions of AI, and our study may not have captured all relevant companies. Finally, the state of these products within the development and marketing cycle remains unclear, and we cannot fully ascertain how many of these products have seen wide uptake or real-world adoption. Further research into this industry is warranted to better understand its size and scope, the makeup of industry leadership and consultants, and implications for surgeons and their patients.
Conclusions
The integration of AI into the surgical field, driven by private sector innovation, promises to transform aspects of daily practice. The present study highlights a global distribution of AI-driven healthcare companies and underscores a substantial financial interest in supporting these advancements. AI technologies are enhancing intraoperative methods, preoperative diagnostics and preparation, OR workflow, and surgical training, thereby promising to improve efficiency, safety, and patient outcomes. However, the need for assessment and oversight remains critical to ensure the safety and efficacy of these emerging technologies before widespread clinical adoption. These findings offer relevant thought points for practicing physicians, policymakers, and industry leaders.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Revolutionizing patient care: the harmonious blend of artificial intelligence and surgical tradition Int J Clin Exp Pathol Stark M Mynbaev O Malvasi A Tinelli A 47501720243845550810.62347/FRIC 2771 PMC 10915289 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: a scoping review Ageing Res Rev Ma B Yang J Wong FK 1018088320233642776610.1016/j.arr.2022.101808 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Advanced data analytics for clinical research part I: what are the tools?Innovations (Phila) Zhou N Corsini EM Jin S Barbosa GR Kell T Antonoff MH Antonoff MB 1141191520203210795810.1177/1556984520902783 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making JAMA Surg Loftus TJ Tighe PJ Filiberto AC 14815815520203182546510.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917 PMC 7286802 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5History of artificial intelligence in medicine Gastrointest Endosc Kaul V Enslin S Gross SA 8078129220203256518410.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Artificial intelligence and orthopaedics: an introduction for clinicians J Bone Joint Surg Am Myers TG Ramkumar PN Ricciardi BF Urish KL Kipper J Ketonis C 83084010220203237912410.2106/JBJS.19.01128 PMC 7508289 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Perspective: limiting antimicrobial resistance with artificial intelligence/machine learning BME Front Amsterdam D 334202310.34133/bmef.0033 PMC 1076949738188353 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Wearable health devices in health care: narrative systematic review JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Lu L Zhang J Xie Y Gao F Xu S Wu X Ye Z 08202010.2196/18907 PMC 768324833164904 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
