# Improving physical function with physiotherapy assistants following intensive care unit admission (EMPRESS): A randomised controlled feasibility study

**Authors:** Rebecca J Cusack, Andrew Bates, Hannah Golding, Kay Mitchell, Linda Denehy, Nicholas Hart, Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Gordon Sturmey, Iain Davey, Zoe van Willigen, Sarah Elliott, Laura Ortiz-RuizDeGordoa, Jessica Cooper, Barbara Philips, Jenny Rains, Sally Pitts, Nigel Beauchamp, Isabel Reading, Mike Grocott

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/17511437251328899 · Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2025-05-16

## TL;DR

This study tested if physiotherapy assistants can help improve recovery after ICU by delivering early rehabilitation, but faced challenges due to the pandemic.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the feasibility of using physiotherapy assistants for early ICU rehabilitation and identifies key challenges for future trials.

## Key findings

- Recruitment was slightly below the target rate of one to two patients per month per site.
- Most patients started interventions within 72 hours, but only 63% of planned interventions were delivered.
- Blinded outcome assessments were completed for 64% of survivors, with 63% of those assessments being blinded.

## Abstract

Early rehabilitation of critically ill patients is challenging due to limited staff resources. This study assessed the feasibility of delivering a randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy assistants delivering early protocolised rehabilitation plus usual care compared with usual care.

We conducted a randomised feasibility study in three U.K. mixed medical/surgical intensive care units. Eligible patients were intubated and ventilated <72 h, expected to be ventilated for a further 48 h, and functionally independent before ICU admission. Patients were randomised to protocolised early rehabilitation plus usual care or usual care. Feasibility outcomes were (i) recruitment of one to two patients/per month/site; (ii) >75% of patients commencing the intervention within 72 h of ventilation with >70% interventions delivered; and (iii) blinded outcome measures recorded at three-time points in >80% of patients.

The study delivery was compromised by the COVID-19 pandemic: 46 patients were enrolled, of which 22 were allocated to intervention. Feasibility outcomes: (i) recruitment of 0.9 patients/month/site, (ii) 90% of patients commenced interventions within 72 h of ventilation, with 166/264 (63%) of study interventions delivered: median total 22.5 min (IQR 15–35) of therapy per day in the usual care group and 45 min (IQR 25–70) in the intervention group, and (iii) the outcome assessments were performed at three-time points for 64% of survivors, 63% of which were blinded.

While delivery of protocolised rehabilitation by physiotherapy assistants is feasible, the design of a future RCT needs to consider strategies to improve recruitment and complete blinded outcome assessments.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), critically ill (MESH:D016638)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084218/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084218/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084218/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084218