# Patient preferences for diagnostic imaging services: Decentralize or not?

**Authors:** Eline M. van den Broek-Altenburg, Jamie S. Benson, Adam J. Atherly, Kristen K. DeStigter, Matteo Lippi Bruni, Matteo Lippi Bruni, Matteo Lippi Bruni, Matteo Lippi Bruni, Matteo Lippi Bruni

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301404 · PLOS One · 2025-05-16

## TL;DR

This study explores patient preferences for diagnostic imaging services and finds that hospital outpatient radiology departments can compete with retail clinics by meeting patient expectations.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific patient subgroups and their preferences for diagnostic imaging services using a discrete choice experiment.

## Key findings

- Experienced patients prefer hospital outpatient radiology departments with lower costs and radiologist interpretation.
- New patients value service ratings and online scheduling more highly.
- HORDs can compete with retail clinics by improving ease of use and meeting patient expectations.

## Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify patient preferences for outpatient diagnostic imaging services and analyze how patients make trade-offs between attributes of these services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We used a DCE with 14 choice questions asking which imaging locations patients would prefer. We used latent class analysis to analyze preference heterogeneity between different patient groups and to estimate the relative value they assign to different attributes of imaging services. Our analysis showed that the “Experienced Patients” subgroup generally value diagnostic imaging services in both acute and chronic situations and had a strong preference for hospital outpatient radiology departments (HORD) that would provide services at lower costs, where their images would be interpreted by a specialty radiologist, the clinic would be recommended by their PCP, online scheduling would be available, service rating were higher, and travel and wait times would be shorter. New Patients significantly valued the service rating of the (HORD and online scheduling. HORDs can be more competitive by providing services that live up to expectations better than available retail radiology clinics (RRCs). Most RRCs do not currently offer online scheduling so ease of use may also steer patients towards HORDs. HORDs have the advantage of being linked to the main medical center which has the reputation of having clinical expertise and more sophisticated technology. We conclude that there is room for medical centers to build HORDs that provide an appealing and competitive alternative to current RRC.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CDKN2A (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) [NCBI Gene 1029] {aka ARF, CAI2, CDK4I, CDKN2, CMM2, INK4}, POLE4 (DNA polymerase epsilon 4, accessory subunit) [NCBI Gene 56655] {aka YHHQ1, p12}, ENDOU (endonuclease, poly(U) specific) [NCBI Gene 8909] {aka P11, PP11, PRSS26}
- **Diseases:** fractures (MESH:D050723), CMS (MESH:C536089), MR (MESH:D008944), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), spinal injuries (MESH:D013124), pain (MESH:D010146), low back pain (MESH:D017116), MMNL (MESH:D004195), cognitive burden (MESH:D003072), HORD (MESH:D003428), HI (MESH:C538424), Arm fractures (MESH:D001134), RRCs (MESH:D000075902)
- **Chemicals:** DCE (-), p5 (MESH:C016883)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084043/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084043/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084043/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12084043