# Experiences and knowledge of nurses, occupational therapists, pharmacists and physiotherapists about certifying fit notes: a UK-wide survey

**Authors:** Jade Kettlewell, Diane Trusson, Katie Powers, Avril Drummond, Claire Anderson, Gill Phillips, Jain Holmes, Kate Radford, Nick Pahl, Shan Martin, Stephen Timmons, Denise Kendrick

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092211 · BMJ Open · 2025-05-15

## TL;DR

This study explores the challenges and training needs of UK healthcare professionals in certifying fit notes, finding that low skills and lack of training are major barriers.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific barriers and facilitators to fit note certification among non-physician healthcare professionals in the UK.

## Key findings

- Only 24% of respondents had certified fit notes, and 37% had completed training.
- Three main barriers were identified: skills, goals, and memory/decision processes.
- The only facilitator was a strong belief in the usefulness of certifying fit notes.

## Abstract

To identify facilitators and barriers to fit note certification among nurses, occupational therapists, pharmacists and physiotherapists (NOPPs), and identify ongoing training needs.

An online survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to gather data from NOPPs to identify implementation barriers and personal, social and environmental influences on fit note certification.

Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Mean TDF domain scores were calculated (mean scores ≤3.5 indicated barriers, ≥5 indicated facilitators). Free-text data were thematically analysed using the TDF.

United Kingdom.

The survey was completed by 198 respondents: physiotherapists (n=66, 33%), occupational therapists (n=49, 25%), nurses (n=44, 22%), pharmacists (n=39, 20%).

Only 47 (24%) of survey respondents had certified fit notes; 66 (37%) had completed training, most pharmacists had done neither. TDF analysis indicated three barriers: 1) ‘skills’ (being able to certify, review and practice completing fit notes) (mean=3.32, SD=0.75, 95% CI 1.84, 4.80); 2) ‘goals’ (the level of priority given to fit note completion) (mean=3.22, SD=0.51, 95% CI 2.21, 4.22); 3) ‘memory, attention and decision processes’ (disagreeing with the statement: ‘certifying fit notes is something I do automatically’) (mean=2.73, SD=0). Free-text comments suggested that low ‘skills’ rates may be due to lack of opportunity to do training. The low priority afforded to completing fit notes, which was not done automatically as part of their role, may reflect the lack of organisational policies/guidelines or priorities.

The only facilitator identified was ‘belief about consequences’ (mean=5.74, SD=0.12, 95% CI: 5.50, 5.98). Participants believed that certifying fit notes was useful and worthwhile.

Legislation allowing NOPPs to undertake fit note certification does not appear to have been successfully implemented. Further resources are required to provide NOPPs with the necessary skills/confidence (e.g., via training) to certify fit notes, supporting more patients to return to and remain in work.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083426/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083426/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083426/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083426