# Intravenous lidocaine for gut function recovery in colonic surgery: a health economic evaluation of the ALLEGRO randomised clinical trial

**Authors:** Marek Atter, Andrew Stoddart, Seonaidh Cotton, Thenmalar Vadiveloo, Karen Innes, Angie Balfour, Robert Arnott, Lorna Aucott, Zoe Batham, Irwin Foo, Graeme MacLennan, Susan Nimmo, Doug Speake, John Norrie, Hugh Paterson

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088298 · BMJ Open · 2025-02-25

## TL;DR

This study evaluated the cost and health outcomes of using intravenous lidocaine during colorectal surgery but found no significant benefits.

## Contribution

The study provides a health economic evaluation of intravenous lidocaine use in colorectal surgery based on a randomized clinical trial.

## Key findings

- Intravenous lidocaine showed no statistically significant differences in costs or health outcomes.
- The intervention costs were slightly lower, but not clinically meaningful.
- No large effects were observed on quality-adjusted life-years or other outcomes.

## Abstract

To compare costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using intravenous lidocaine (bolus given at induction of anaesthesia, followed by infusion for 6–12 hours) during colorectal surgery to improve the return of gastrointestinal function.

Within-trial planned analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial using an intention-to-treat approach.

27 hospitals from across the UK.

557 patients aged 25–91 having minimally invasive elective colorectal resection.

A 1:1 randomisation between intravenous lidocaine and placebo, minimised for age (<50 years, 50–74 years, ≥75 years), gender, and trial centre.

Mean differences between trial arms in 30-day and 90-day quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 30-day total National Health Service costs, as well as the 30-day incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Compliance and data quality were high. Intravenous lidocaine is associated with differences of £38 (95% CI: −£463, £589) in total 30-day costs, −0.0005 (95% CI: −0.0027, 0.0015) in 30-day QALYs and −0.0008 (95% CI: −0.0066, 0.0048) in 90-day QALYs. No large, statistically significant or meaningful differences in primary or secondary outcome measures between trial arms were detected, other than for the intervention costs.

Intravenous lidocaine is not found to impact costs or health outcomes for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. In the absence of a clinical effect, disinvestment from perioperative lidocaine could save costs associated with infusion monitoring.

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 52352431.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lidocaine (PubChem CID 3676)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** lidocaine (MESH:D008012)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083329/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083329/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083329/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12083329