# Identifying deleterious noncoding variation through gain and loss of CTCF binding activity

**Authors:** Colby Tubbs, Mary Lauren Benton, Evonne McArthur, John A. Capra, Douglas M. Ruderfer

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.009 · American Journal of Human Genetics · 2025-03-05

## TL;DR

This study identifies rare noncoding genetic variants that disrupt CTCF binding, suggesting they may contribute to human traits and disease.

## Contribution

A novel framework to prioritize CTCF binding site variants using binding activity and evolutionary signals.

## Key findings

- High CTCF binding activity correlates with conserved nucleotides and high-quality CTCF motifs.
- Loss of CTCF binding at active loci is strongly associated with rare, singleton SNVs.
- Variants causing CTCF binding loss are as rare as missense variants, indicating purifying selection.

## Abstract

CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) regulates gene expression through DNA binding at thousands of genomic loci. Genetic variation in these CTCF binding sites (CBSs) is an important driver of phenotypic variation, yet extracting those that are likely to have functional consequences in whole-genome sequencing remains challenging. To address this, we develop a hypothesis-driven framework to identify and prioritize CBS variants in gnomAD. We synthesize CTCF’s binding patterns at 1,063,878 genomic loci across 214 biological contexts into a summary of binding activity. We find that high binding activity significantly correlates with both conserved nucleotides (Pearson R = 0.35, p < 2.2 × 10−16) and sequences that contain high-quality CTCF binding motifs (Pearson R = 0.63, p = 2.9 × 10−12). We then use binding activity to evaluate high-confidence allelic binding predictions for 1,253,329 single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) in gnomAD that disrupt a CBS. We find a strong, positive relationship between the mutability-adjusted proportion of singletons (MAPS) metric and the loss of CTCF binding at loci with high in vitro activity (Pearson R = 0.74, p < 2.2 × 10−16). To contextualize these findings, we apply MAPS to other functional classes of variation and find that a subset of 339,380 loss of CTCF binding variants is observed as infrequently as missense variants are. This work nominates these thousands of rare, noncoding variants that disrupt CTCF binding for further functional studies while providing a blueprint for prioritizing variation in other transcription factor binding sequences.

This study develops a functional annotation scheme for CTCF binding site (CBS) variants and applies it to 76,156 WGS samples in gnomAD. In these data, we find evidence for purifying selection acting against the loss of CTCF binding, supporting a functional role for CBS variation in human traits and disease.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) [NCBI Gene 10664]
- **Proteins:** CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) [NCBI Gene 10664] {aka CFAP108, FAP108, MRD21}, CBS (cystathionine beta-synthase) [NCBI Gene 875] {aka HIP4}

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12081274/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12081274/full.md

## References

73 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12081274/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12081274