Correction: Remote Ischemic Postconditioning vs. Physical Exercise After Stroke: an Alternative Rehabilitation Strategy?
Xiaokun Geng, Qingzhu Wang, Hangil Lee, Christian Huber, Melissa Wills, Kenneth Elkin, Fengwu Li, Xunming Ji, Yuchuan Ding
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion · Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research · Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Correction: Molecular Neurobiology (2021) 58:3141–3157
10.1007/s12035-021-02329-6
This is concerning with our article titled “Remote Ischemic Postconditioning vs. Physical Exercise After Stroke: an Alternative Rehabilitation Strategy?” published in volume 58 on page 3154 of Molecular Neurobiology before.
Recently, we identified an error in Fig. 10 Ang-2, where the internal reference β-actin (beta-actin), serving as a loading control, was mistakenly represented by the wrong blot.
After full consideration, we decided to make a correction on the figure based on the rigorous attitude of scholarship.
Fig. 10 with error being marked.
Herewith, the corrected images of Fig. 10.
These corrections do not change the conclusions and text of the article. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers and the editorial board for the Molecular Neurobiology.
The original article has been corrected.